Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 14 of 36
4 categories · RankedLogRocket
51Judge labels
1First choices
13Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Error monitoring for mid-market buyers
Rank 12 of 42 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 15% of its 20 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of LogRocket →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business13 of 36
0%11 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market12 of 42
0%20 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise32 of 48
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
In error monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LogRocket for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error and crash monitoring | Developer platform | 0% | 12 of 42 | 15% | 20 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Application performance monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 37 of 66 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 46% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
| Client-side protection | Security operations | 0% | 111 of 120 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by cside at 13% | |
| Website and synthetic monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 60 of 67 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by UptimeRobot at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, LogRocket held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Error monitoring · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 11 of 39
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 42 → 37 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error monitoring | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 12 of 42 |
| APM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 37 of 66, unchanged |
| Client-side protection | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 111 of 120, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LogRocket across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LogRocket across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative12 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative51 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“LogRocket / FullStory: These are primarily digital experience monitoring (DEM) tools... though their backend/API error tracking is weaker than Sentry's.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Error monitoring · scale prompt · alternative
“Pros: Unique session replay feature helps debug issues visually” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Error monitoring · budget prompt · alternative
“Main focus is frontend UX debugging and session replay | LogRocket” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Error monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose LogRocket if your app has a complex frontend interface” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Error monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“LogRocket — Privacy Red Flags ... Create compliance nightmares” Kimi K2 · Error monitoring · negative prompt · hard negative
“The additional caution with LogRocket Galileo AI is third-party model use... session replay + AI summarization is the highest risk class, even when redaction is offered.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Error monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools that record user sessions like LogRocket or Raygun can inadvertently capture Personally Identifiable Information [PII]” Muse Glimmer 30B · Uptime monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution: Because you are monitoring payment pages, you must configure LogRocket ... to mask sensitive data” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Client-side protection · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LogRocket, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LogRocket was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LogRocket, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LogRocket was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LogRocket. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 51 answers that named LogRocket and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ones.com20
guideflow.com17
citehawk.com12
newrelic.com12
scoutapm.com12
cubeapm.com11
debugg.ai11
dupple.com11
posthog.com11
devopsschool.com10
127 of the 127 domain citations in answers naming LogRocket came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
logrocket.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, LogRocket takes 0% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.ShowHide
Search and answers
logrocket.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, LogRocket takes 0% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “error monitoring tool”
3
Position for “error monitoring tools”
3
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“logrocket”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 83 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 252,222 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 57,148 · 1,436 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 12,348
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 12 of 42 in error monitoring
Segment leader
76%
Sentry
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 51 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 41 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on logrocket.com
8,247
subdomains included
Content
6,647
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 5,990 | 73 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 366 | 13 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 169 | 1 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Conference or event | 73 | 2 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Case study | 33 | 0 | 2025-09-04 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 0 | 2023-03-02 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2024-01-08 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2025-10-23 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2021-03-08 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2025-08-29 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Importing adobe illustrator files figma blog
- 2026-09-28Vibe coding vs software engineering comparison
- 2026-09-26React viewtransition vs motion comparing animation approaches comparison
- 2026-09-24Growth design boosting conversions with data blog
- 2026-09-23Foldable iphone product innovation blog
- 2026-09-23Using proto personas for ux designs blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page logrocket.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow LogRocket
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LogRocket is its own company.ShowHide
The company
LogRocket is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI session replay that catches issues before your users do
- Price stated
- Access all of LogRocket's features free for 14 days. Cancel any time. logrocket.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start for free logrocket.com
- Customers named
- 7-ElevenAppfireBlue Cross Blue Shield of MassachusettsCox AutomotivethredUPTecovas
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What LogRocket's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: logrocket.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LogRocket's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LogRocket, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LogRocket by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LogRocket is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LogRocket, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.