Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 of 36, unchanged
3 categories · RankedPostHog
25Judge labels
3First choices
4Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Error monitoring for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 42 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 36
0%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market6 of 42
2%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise47 of 48
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In error monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PostHog for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error and crash monitoring | Developer platform | 2% | 6 of 42 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Sentry at 76% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Telemetry pipelines | IT operations and endpoint | 2% | 17 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OpenTelemetry Collector at 37% | |
| LLM gateways and observability | Data platform | 0% | 33 of 69 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LiteLLM at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, PostHog held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Error monitoring · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 → 6 of 39
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 → 45 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error monitoring | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 6 of 42 |
| Telemetry pipelines | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 17 of 124, unchanged |
| LLM gateways | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 33 of 69, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PostHog across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PostHog across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels2
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you want a modern, zero-maintenance cloud tool without the fear of getting hit with an immediate bill, PostHog is the top recommendation.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Error monitoring · budget prompt · first choice
“PostHog is the most powerful option for mid-market SaaS” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Telemetry pipelines · direct prompt · first choice
“PostHog is the best choice if you want errors tightly linked to product analytics, feature flags, and warehouse data” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Error monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative
“Popular alternatives without these flags: PostHog (free 100K exceptions if you use their analytics)” Grok 4.20 · Error monitoring · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“session replays are a major compliance hazard” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Error monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PostHog, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PostHog was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PostHog, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PostHog was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PostHog. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 25 answers that named PostHog and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com13
dupple.com12
ones.com12
scoutapm.com11
posthog.comYour site10
ssojet.com9
newrelic.com7
toolradar.com7
betterstack.com6
flatlogic.com6
Eighty-three of the ninety-three domain citations in answers naming PostHog came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
posthog.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, PostHog takes 2% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.ShowHide
Search and answers
posthog.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, PostHog takes 2% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “error monitoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “error monitoring tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 33,100 a month (“posthog”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 271 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 25,936 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,571 · 342 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 12,983
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 6 of 42 in error monitoring
Segment leader
76%
Sentry
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 25 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 23 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on posthog.com
13,453
subdomains included
Content
1,051
counted in the table below
Documentation
3,551
Product · Integration
15 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 345 | 17 | 2026-09-16 | Feature flags, ETL | |
| News or press | 195 | 11 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 175 | 0 | 2026-06-02 | Data warehouses, APM | |
| Conference or event | 157 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 58 | 1 | 2026-07-21 | Object storage | |
| Case study | 53 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 46 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 17 | 0 | 2023-12-19 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Archive news or press
- 2026-09-16Build or buy feature flags blog
- 2026-09-15Self driving loops blog
- 2026-09-14If ai writes all the code whats left news or press
- 2026-09-09Irl events blog
- 2026-09-09Multimodal models need video blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- October 6, 2026SFTechWeek: AI Agents Builder Night with PostHog and FriendsHogpatch, San Francisco · hosted
- October 2, 2026Self-Driving Cafe: Madrid w/ PostHogOsom Salamanca, Madrid, Spain · hosted
As the event pages on posthog.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page posthog.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow PostHog
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
PostHog is its own company.ShowHide
The company
PostHog is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- We make your product self-driving
- For
- your product and company data
- Price stated
- Usage-based pricing posthog.com
- Starting price
- 0 posthog.com
- Free plan or trial
- Generous free tier posthog.com
- Integrations claimed
- 700 posthog.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2GDPRCCPAHIPAAHIPAA BAA
- Hosting
- US (Virginia)EU (Frankfurt)USAGermanyEUGlobal
- Customers named
- PostHogOpen CustomersAirbusArenaElevenLabsExaHasuraHeyGen
What PostHog's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: posthog.com, posthog.com/pricing, trust.posthog.com, posthog.com/platform-packages, posthog.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PostHog's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PostHog, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PostHog by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PostHog is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PostHog, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.