Small business▲+5Since September 2026: 14% → 20%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
20%from 14% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 2 of 36, unchanged
1 category · RankedHoneybadger
91Judge labels
13First choices
9Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
20% in Error monitoring for small business buyers
Rank 10 of 42 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 23 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Honeybadger →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business2 of 36
20%50 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market10 of 42
0%23 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise6 of 48
2%14 labels
criticized challenger
In error monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Honeybadger for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error and crash monitoring | Developer platform | 0% | 10 of 42 | 4% | 23 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Honeybadger held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Error monitoring · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 → 9 of 39
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
3%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 of 47, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error monitoring | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 10 of 42 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Honeybadger across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Honeybadger across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labels6
Paraphrase5 labels1
Comparative21 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels4
Scale-constrained9 labels2
Negative21 labels8not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative91 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Honeybadger if you're a smaller mid-market team that also needs uptime monitoring included” Kimi K2 · Error monitoring · direct prompt · alternative
“developer-focused indie options like Honeybadger offer highly transparent pricing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Error monitoring · negative prompt · alternative
“Honeybadger if you want errors, uptime checks and a status page on one flat bill.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Error monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative
“Honeybadger for a leaner setup that also needs uptime and job monitoring” GPT-6 Luna · Error monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Caution (mild): Limited feature set for larger teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Error monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Honeybadger, over the 91 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Honeybadger was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Honeybadger, over the 91 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Honeybadger was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Honeybadger. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 86 of the 91 answers that named Honeybadger and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ones.com60
dupple.com51
guideflow.com41
toolradar.com31
rollbar.com24
scoutapm.com24
citehawk.com23
flatlogic.com23
sentry.io22
zipdo.co21
320 of the 320 domain citations in answers naming Honeybadger came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
honeybadger.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Honeybadger takes 0% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.ShowHide
Search and answers
honeybadger.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Honeybadger takes 0% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “error monitoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “error monitoring tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 201,000 a month (“honeybadger”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 98 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 13,851 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,408 · 144 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,887
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 10 of 42 in error monitoring
Segment leader
76%
Sentry
- First choices
- 13 across its categories
- Named in
- 91 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 86 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on honeybadger.io
1,061
subdomains included
Content
756
counted in the table below
Documentation
65
Product · Integration
2 · 5
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 725 | 10 | 2026-08-28 | Feature flags, APM | |
| Comparison | 15 | 1 | 2026-07-20 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | 2 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| News or press | 5 | undated | |||
| Case study | 1 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Uptime monitoring conference or event
- 2026-08-28Starlette middleware blog
- 2026-08-28Python blog
- 2026-08-18Teaching llms badgerql blog
- 2026-08-18Developer%20tools blog
- 2026-08-18Devops blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page honeybadger.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Honeybadger
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Honeybadger is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Honeybadger is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Real-time error tracking, APM & logging for your favorite stack. Helps developers find and fix issues faster. Get started for free.
- For
- developers
- Price stated
- Pricing honeybadger.io
- Starting price
- $26/month honeybadger.io/plans
- Free plan or trial
- Get started for free honeybadger.io
- Integrations claimed
- 30 honeybadger.io/integrations
- Certifications
- SOC2HIPAA SecurityBAASOC2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
- Hosting
- EUEuropean UnionUnited States
- Customers named
- Punchpass.comSchedulista.comYvesBlue
What Honeybadger's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: honeybadger.io, honeybadger.io/plans, honeybadger.io/security, honeybadger.io/platforms, honeybadger.io/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Honeybadger's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Honeybadger, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Honeybadger by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Honeybadger is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Honeybadger, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.