Every category where a model named Raygun for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Error and crash monitoring	Developer platform	0%	7 of 44	7%	15	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Raygun yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Raygun across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	3	0	1	4
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase9 labelsNone

Comparative15 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative12 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative45 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best For: Teams needing robust mobile and server-side monitoring with a focus on reliability engineering.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Error monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Raygun if you want frontend real-user monitoring bundled with error tracking.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Error monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative

“Raygun is a solid choice if you want built‑in RUM alongside crash reporting.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Error monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative

“Offers error tracking, crash reporting, and application performance monitoring.” Mistral Small · Error monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“others like Raygun and Honeybadger can become expensive very quickly” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Error monitoring · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Raygun, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Raygun was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sentry42 of 4528Not in the top three

Rollbar37 of 453Not in the top three

Bugsnag29 of 450Not in the top three

Datadog26 of 452Not in the top three

New Relic23 of 452Not in the top three

Honeybadger18 of 453Not in the top three

Airbrake16 of 450Not in the top three

LogRocket14 of 450Not in the top three

GlitchTip9 of 450Not in the top three

Datadog Error Tracking8 of 451Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Raygun. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 37 of the 45 answers that named Raygun and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

scoutapm.com26

rollbar.com24

raygun.comYour site18

worldmetrics.org17

guideflow.com14

cubeapm.com12

sentry.io12

vibereference.com12

debugg.ai11

observeone.com11

139 of the 157 domain citations in answers naming Raygun came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

scoutapm.com/blog/best-error-monitoring-tools23

raygun.com/blog/best-error-monitoring-tools16

rollbar.com/blog/best-error-monitoring-tools16

guideflow.com/blog/error-monitoring-software14

worldmetrics.org/best/error-monitoring-software14

debugg.ai/resources/best-error-monitoring-tools-202411

observeone.com/best/error-monitoring-tools11

ones.com/blog/error-reporting-software-comparison-8-tools-worth-trying11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Raygun's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Raygun, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at raygun.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.