Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 23 of 36
2 categories · RankedRaygun
55Judge labels
1First choices
14Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Error monitoring for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 42 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 20 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Raygun →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business15 of 36
0%12 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market5 of 42
2%20 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise11 of 48
0%13 labels
criticized challenger
In error monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Raygun for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error and crash monitoring | Developer platform | 2% | 5 of 42 | 5% | 20 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Website and synthetic monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 63 of 67 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by UptimeRobot at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Raygun held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Error monitoring · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 5 of 39
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 14 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error monitoring | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 5 of 42 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Raygun across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Raygun across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase15 labels1
Comparative15 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative18 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative55 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend Sentry or Raygun as the best fit.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Error monitoring · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best For: B2B SaaS companies and product managers who want to prioritize bug fixes based on direct financial and user impact.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Error monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative
“When to consider Raygun instead - You want bundled real‑user monitoring (RUM) and APM with crash reporting in one vendor.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Error monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“stick to dedicated error trackers (like Sentry, Rollbar, or Raygun)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Error monitoring · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Tools that record user sessions like LogRocket or Raygun can inadvertently capture Personally Identifiable Information [PII]” Muse Glimmer 30B · Uptime monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution: Niche focus & per-event cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Error monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Raygun, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Raygun was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Raygun, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Raygun was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Raygun. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 53 of the 55 answers that named Raygun and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ones.com32
dupple.com22
guideflow.com20
g2.com18
devopsschool.com16
dotcom-monitor.com14
raygun.comYour site14
cubeapm.com13
citehawk.com12
gitnux.org12
159 of the 173 domain citations in answers naming Raygun came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
raygun.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Raygun takes 2% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.ShowHide
Search and answers
raygun.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Raygun takes 2% of first choices and Sentry takes 76%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “error monitoring tool”
5
Position for “error monitoring tools”
7
- Searches for its name, Google
- 60,500 a month (“raygun”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1,699 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 21,222 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,302 · 118 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,936
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 5 of 42 in error monitoring
Segment leader
76%
Sentry
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 55 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 53 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on raygun.com
995
subdomains included
Content
711
counted in the table below
Documentation
208
Product · Integration
6 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 560 | 2 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Case study | 44 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 35 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 19 | 0 | 2018-10-11 | ||
| News or press | 19 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 18 | 0 | 2023-12-05 | ||
| Report or ebook | 9 | 0 | 2017-07-21 | ||
| Conference or event | 5 | 0 | 2016-10-27 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2016-09-08 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2014-05-06 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-08Raygun apm agent 3 1 async correlation blog
- 2026-08-24Raygun apm agent 3 0 14 blog
- 2026-04-14Raygun mcp getting started blog
- 2025-11-04Api error instances blog
- 2025-10-21Raygun mcp blog
- 2025-04-10Announcing p75 rum alerting support blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page raygun.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Raygun
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Raygun is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Raygun is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Application Monitoring For Web & Mobile Apps
- For
- tech leads, CX experts, and performance engineers
- Price stated
- On-demand pricing that scales with you raygun.com
- Starting price
- 40 raygun.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Get free unlimited monitoring for 14 days raygun.com
- Certifications
- HIPAAGDPRCCPAPCI compliantGDPR complianceGDPR compliantHIPAA compliant
- Hosting
- US-EAST-1
- Customers named
- VendSlackTwitterNetflixEnergiaAttikkGADNRSkimmer
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Raygun's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: raygun.com, raygun.com/pricing, raygun.com/security, raygun.com/platform, raygun.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Raygun's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Raygun, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Raygun by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Raygun is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Raygun, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.