IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Evolveum midPoint · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Evolveum midPoint

8Judge labels

3First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Evolveum midPoint was named 5 times in IGA, where Lumos led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business21 of 81

under the label threshold

Mid-market6 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprise45 of 69

under the label threshold

In iga · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Evolveum midPoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Identity governance	Identity and access	5%	6 of 77	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Lumos at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Evolveum midPoint yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Evolveum midPoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels3

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Free/Open-Source Option: Evolveum midPoint ... consistently regarded as the most capable open-source IGA platform available” Kimi K2 · IGA · budget prompt · first choice

“Best Open-Source Platform (Zero Licensing Fees): Evolveum midPoint ... midPoint is the gold standard” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · budget prompt · first choice

“midPoint (open-source) is the strongest option, though it requires ongoing maintenance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · IGA · budget prompt · first choice

“If you prefer open source, consider midPoint, Apache Syncope, or OpenIAM” Mistral Small · IGA · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Evolveum midPoint, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Evolveum midPoint was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Entra ID Governance5 of 81Not in the top three

SailPoint5 of 80Not in the top three

Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud5 of 80Not in the top three

AccessOwl4 of 81Not in the top three

JumpCloud4 of 81Not in the top three

Iden3 of 80Not in the top three

Okta Identity Governance3 of 80Not in the top three

tenfold2 of 81Not in the top three

Apache Syncope2 of 80Not in the top three

Keycloak2 of 80Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Evolveum midPoint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 8 answers that named Evolveum midPoint and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com5

solutionsreview.com5

startwithidentity.com5

accessowl.com4

gartner.com4

idenhq.com4

aimultiple.com3

askmeidentity.com3

clever.cloud3

cotocus.com3

Thirty-nine of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Evolveum midPoint came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

solutionsreview.com/identity-management/the-best-free-and-open-source-identity-management-5

startwithidentity.com/articles/top-5-open-source-iga-tools5

accessowl.com/blog/buyers-guide-for-iga-tools-by-team-size4

gartner.com/reviews/market/identity-governance-administration4

idenhq.com/en/blog/identity-governance-and-administration-complete4

aimultiple.com/iga-solutions3

clever.cloud/blog/engineering/2025/11/19/best-open-source-iam3

cotocus.com/blog/top-10-identity-governance-administration-iga-features-pros-cons-comparis3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Evolveum midPoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Evolveum midPoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at evolveum.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.