Index › Products › Dazz · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Dazz

4Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Dazz was named 3 times in ASPM, where Aikido Security led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market70 of 70

under the label threshold

Enterprise49 of 69

under the label threshold

In aspm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Dazz for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Application security posture management	Developer platform	0%	70 of 70	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Dazz yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Dazz across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Dazz and Bionic – standalone versions are being absorbed into parent platforms” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASPM · negative prompt · hard negative

“Dazz folded into Wiz, so any evaluation of legacy Dazz material should be checked against current Wiz positioning.” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative

“Wiz acquiring Dazz (before Wiz itself was acquired by Alphabet/Google in a historic deal)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Dazz, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dazz was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ArmorCode3 of 40Not among the top eight

Cycode ASPM3 of 40Not among the top eight

Wiz3 of 40Not among the top eight

Snyk2 of 41Not among the top eight

Aikido Security2 of 40Not among the top eight

Apiiro2 of 40Not among the top eight

Bionic2 of 40Not among the top eight

DefectDojo2 of 40Not among the top eight

Jit2 of 40Not among the top eight

OX Security2 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dazz. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Dazz and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wiz.io4

cycode.com3

gartner.com3

invicti.com3

orca.security3

apiiro.com2

checkmarx.com2

datainsightsmarket.com2

expertinsights.com2

g2.com2

No domain is on file for Dazz, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/application-security-posture-management-aspm-tools3

checkmarx.com/learn/aspm/best-aspm-tools-5-platforms-to-watch-in-20262

g2.com/categories/application-security-posture-management-aspm2

guideflow.com/blog/aspm-software2

interconnectedsecurity.com/visibility/aspm-a-misguided-solution2

invicti.com/blog/web-security/top-10-aspm-tools2

marketintelo.com/report/application-security-posture-management-market2

orca.security/resources/blog/application-security-posture-management-aspm2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Dazz

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dazz's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dazz, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Dazz by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Dazz is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Dazz, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.