Index › Products › Bionic · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Bionic

3Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Bionic was named 3 times in ASPM and 1 other category, where Aikido Security led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market69 of 70

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In aspm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bionic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Application security posture management	Developer platform	0%	69 of 70	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 37%
Cloud security posture management	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	78 of 80	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 37%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bionic yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bionic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Received negative feedback for being extremely basic and limited... making it unsuitable for organizations with strict compliance requirements.” Mistral Small · CSPM · negative prompt · hard negative

“Dazz and Bionic – standalone versions are being absorbed into parent platforms” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASPM · negative prompt · hard negative

“CrowdStrike acquiring Bionic” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bionic, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bionic was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Snyk2 of 31Not among the top eight

Dazz2 of 30Not among the top eight

Wiz2 of 30Not among the top eight

Aikido Security1 of 30Not among the top eight

ArmorCode1 of 30Not among the top eight

Check Point CloudGuard1 of 30Not among the top eight

Cider Security1 of 30Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike1 of 30Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM1 of 30Not among the top eight

Cycode ASPM1 of 30Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bionic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Bionic and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com2

reddit.com2

store.frost.com2

wiz.io2

aikido.dev1

apiiro.com1

apis.io1

appsecnews.com1

checkmarx.com1

cloudaware.com1

No domain is on file for Bionic, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

store.frost.com/application-security-posture-management-aspm-sector-global-2024-2029.html2

aikido.dev/blog/top-cloud-security-posture-management-cspm-tools1

apiiro.com/blog/aspm-breakdown-pros-and-cons-of-different-approaches-to-application-securi1

apis.io/providers/dazz1

appsecnews.com/articles/best-aspm-tools1

checkmarx.com/learn/aspm/best-aspm-tools-5-platforms-to-watch-in-20261

cloudaware.com/blog/top-cloud-security-posture-management-vendors1

complyjet.com/blog/best-cspm-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Bionic

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bionic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bionic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bionic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Bionic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bionic, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.