Every category where a model named KeeperPAM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Privileged access management	Identity and access	11%	4 of 74	9%	23	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for KeeperPAM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated KeeperPAM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	3	0	0	6
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	1	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	1	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	1	0	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels6

Paraphrase12 labels7

Comparative19 labels9not counted in share

Budget-constrained22 labels7

Scale-constrained7 labels1

Negative14 labels6not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative90 labels in all, every segment counted; 21 of the 36 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Keeper Security – Best for combining password management and privileged access at an affordable price. Strong overall value for small businesses.” MiniMax M2.5 · PAM · budget prompt · first choice

“combining password and privileged access management affordably, making it a strong choice for budget-conscious teams” Mistral Small · PAM · budget prompt · first choice

“Safer Alternatives to Consider ... KeeperPAM - Cloud-native, zero-knowledge architecture, FedRAMP High authorized” Kimi K2 · PAM · negative prompt · first choice

“Keeper Security (KeeperPAM) | Pros: Great balance of cost, ease of use, and quick deployment.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PAM · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Limited scope – mainly password vaulting with basic session controls, not a full PAM suite.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PAM · comparative prompt · soft negative

“appears less focused on deep legacy enterprise controls than CyberArk/BeyondTrust” Perplexity Sonar · PAM · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as KeeperPAM, over the 89 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and KeeperPAM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CyberArk61 of 8911Not in the top three

Delinea61 of 895Not in the top three

ManageEngine PAM36059 of 8912Not in the top three

BeyondTrust50 of 892Not in the top three

Teleport49 of 895Not in the top three

StrongDM44 of 892Not in the top three

Securden Unified PAM19 of 892Not in the top three

JumpCloud16 of 890Not in the top three

Delinea Secret Server14 of 892Not in the top three

HashiCorp Vault11 of 890Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named KeeperPAM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 71 of the 89 answers that named KeeperPAM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

startwithidentity.com58

aimultiple.com38

expertinsights.com36

heimdalsecurity.com31

keepersecurity.com27

compliancestronghold.com22

delinea.com22

gartner.com22

mitigata.com21

learn.g2.com19

296 of the 296 domain citations in answers naming KeeperPAM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-pam-for-smb46

aimultiple.com/pam-solutions38

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/the-top-privileged-access-management-pam33

heimdalsecurity.com/blog/privileged-access-management-pam-software-solutions30

compliancestronghold.com/best-pam-solution22

mitigata.com/blog/best-pam-tools21

learn.g2.com/best-pam-software19

gartner.com/reviews/market/privileged-access-management18

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as KeeperPAM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as KeeperPAM; a claim can dispute any of them.

Keeper Security 4Keeper Security (KeeperPAM) 4Keeper 2Keeper Security KeeperPAM 2Keeper Business 1Keeper Security (BPM/PAM module) 1Keeper Security - KeeperPAM 1Keeper Security / KeeperPAM 1Keeper Security Enterprise 1KeeperPAM (Keeper Security) 1KeeperPAM (by Keeper Security) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when KeeperPAM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as KeeperPAM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at keeper.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.