Small business▼−1Since September 2026: 27% → 27%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
27%from 27% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 1 → 2 of 68
2 categories · RankedKeeperPAM
96Judge labels
22First choices
3Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
29% in PAM for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 73 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 30 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of KeeperPAM →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business2 of 75
29%45 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 73
9%30 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise5 of 55
4%16 labels
accepted challenger
In pam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named KeeperPAM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Privileged access management | Identity and access | 9% | 3 of 73 | 3% | 30 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 11% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Non-human identity management | Identity and access | 0% | 67 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JumpCloud at 14% |
Movement
Since September 2026, KeeperPAM held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · PAM · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 11% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 11% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 68
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 3% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 3% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 5 of 50
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAM | 11% | 8% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 11% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 3 of 73 |
| NHI management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 67 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated KeeperPAM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated KeeperPAM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct19 labels9
Paraphrase14 labels9
Comparative19 labels9not counted in share
Budget-constrained22 labels3
Scale-constrained11 labels1
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative96 labels in all, every segment counted; 22 of the 31 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Keeper consistently leads the industry in ease of implementation (85%) and ease of administration (85%). You can deploy it in days, not months.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PAM · direct prompt · first choice
“1. KeeperPAM (by Keeper Security) ... Best for: Rapid deployment, overall simplicity, and ease of use.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd pick KeeperPAM for a typical mid-sized B2B company that wants the fastest path to value” Perplexity Sonar · PAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Delinea, BeyondTrust, and KeeperPAM are often the sweet spot at your scale.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PAM · scale prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Keeper Security or similar low-tier password manager offerings, but these are generally *not full PAM platforms*” Perplexity Sonar · PAM · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as KeeperPAM, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and KeeperPAM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as KeeperPAM, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and KeeperPAM was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named KeeperPAM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 91 of the 95 answers that named KeeperPAM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
aimultiple.com45
startwithidentity.com43
keepersecurity.com38
thectoclub.com37
netwrix.com36
expertinsights.com30
cybersecuritynews.com28
securden.com27
guptadeepak.com22
g2.com21
327 of the 327 domain citations in answers naming KeeperPAM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
keeper.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, KeeperPAM takes 9% of first choices and Delinea Secret Server takes 37%.ShowHide
Search and answers
keeper.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, KeeperPAM takes 9% of first choices and Delinea Secret Server takes 37%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “privileged access management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “privileged access management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“keeperpam”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 144,125 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,176 · 202 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,943
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
9%
rank 3 of 73 in PAM
Segment leader
37%
Delinea Secret Server
- First choices
- 22 across its categories
- Named in
- 95 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 91 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on keeper.io
7,243
subdomains included
Content
6
counted in the table below
Documentation
5,008
Product · Integration
0 · 68
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 1 | 2026-07-02 | ||
| News or press | 3 | 2 | 2026-09-18 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-18Newsletter news or press
- 2026-09-17Newsletter news or press
- 2026-07-02Fundamentals glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page keeper.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as KeeperPAM
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as KeeperPAM; a claim can dispute any of them.
Keeper Security 12Keeper Security (KeeperPAM) 3Keeper 2Keeper PAM 2Keeper Privileged Access Manager (KeeperPAM) 1Keeper Security KeeperPAM 1Keeper Security PAM 1KeeperPAM (by Keeper Security) 1
Follow KeeperPAM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
KeeperPAM is its own company.ShowHide
The company
KeeperPAM is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Privileged access management for every identity
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial keeper.io
- Certifications
- FIPS 140-3ISO 27001, 27017 and 27018SOC 2FedRAMP High CertifiedGovRAMP High AuthorizedHIPAAGDPRFDA 21 CFR Part 11 Compliant
- Customers named
- Atlassian Williams F1 TeamWilliams Racing
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, hosting
What KeeperPAM's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: keeper.io, trust.keeper.io. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when KeeperPAM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as KeeperPAM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for KeeperPAM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where KeeperPAM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name KeeperPAM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where KeeperPAM is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where KeeperPAM is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideKeeperPAM is among the products AI models recommend first in Privileged access management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.