IT AI Index
Index Vendors › miniOrange PAM · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

miniOrange PAM

15Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in PAM for mid-market buyers
Rank 9 of 74 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In pam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named miniOrange PAM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Privileged access managementIdentity and access2%9 of 740%12accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for miniOrange PAM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated miniOrange PAM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast02002
Mistral Small11002
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labels1
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I would recommend ManageEngine PAM360 or miniOrange PAM as the top PAM tool options.” Mistral Small · PAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“miniOrange PAM is a modern, identity-centric PAM solution designed for mid-market to enterprise organizations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · PAM · direct prompt · alternative
“If you need a more identity-centric or cloud-native solution, consider miniOrange PAM or JumpCloud.” Mistral Small · PAM · direct prompt · alternative
“Mid-market to enterprise organizations seeking strong security controls without operational complexity” MiniMax M2.5 · PAM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as miniOrange PAM, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and miniOrange PAM was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ManageEngine PAM36015 of 154Not in the top three
BeyondTrust12 of 150Not in the top three
CyberArk10 of 150Not in the top three
Securden Unified PAM6 of 153Not in the top three
Delinea6 of 152Not in the top three
Netwrix Privilege Secure6 of 150Not in the top three
Delinea Secret Server5 of 155Not in the top three
KeeperPAM3 of 152Not in the top three
JumpCloud3 of 150Not in the top three
StrongDM2 of 150Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named miniOrange PAM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named miniOrange PAM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

netwrix.com12
mitigata.com11
oneidentity.com10
aimultiple.com9
cybervendorguide.com7
startwithidentity.com7
compliancestronghold.com6
ecommercefastlane.com6
decryptiondigest.com5
expertinsights.com5

Seventy-eight of the seventy-eight domain citations in answers naming miniOrange PAM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when miniOrange PAM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as miniOrange PAM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at miniorange.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack