| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Privileged access management | Identity and access | 24% | 2 of 73 | 13% | 46 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 21% → 25%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Non-human identity management | Identity and access | 0% | 28 of 128 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by JumpCloud at 14% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAM | 21% | 25% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 21% → 25%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 73, unchanged |
| NHI management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 28 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ManageEngine PAM360 is widely considered the best value proposition in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) space” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PAM · budget prompt · first choice
“ManageEngine PAM360 — Best Overall Value ... migrate to ManageEngine PAM360 — it offers the best bang-for-buck” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PAM · budget prompt · first choice
“The best privileged access management platform for a company with a limited budget is ManageEngine PAM360” Llama 4 Maverick · PAM · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Pick for Mid-Market ... I'd recommend starting with ManageEngine PAM360 or Delinea” MiniMax M2.5 · PAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“ManageEngine PAM360 may be a better fit for larger requirements, but not a low-budget pick: its published subscription starts at $7,995/year.” GPT-6 Luna · PAM · budget prompt · soft negative
“received criticism for its user interface, performance issues, and limited support for modern cloud and DevOps environments” Mistral Small · PAM · negative prompt · soft negative
“It has a track record of severe vulnerabilities, including critical unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) flaws” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PAM · negative prompt · soft negative
“reviewers often highlight that the platform lacks the depth of granular control found in enterprise leaders” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PAM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 126 of the 128 answers that named ManageEngine PAM360 and are not a share of its labels.
411 of the 446 domain citations in answers naming ManageEngine PAM360 came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What ManageEngine PAM360's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: manageengine.com/it/manageengine-security-response-center.html, manageengine.com/privileged-access-management/pam-solution.html, manageengine.com/privileged-access-management/pam-software.html, manageengine.com/privileged-access-management/whats-new-in-pam360.html, manageengine.com/privileged-access-management/zero-trust-pam-solution.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ManageEngine PAM360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ManageEngine PAM360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ManageEngine PAM360 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
ManageEngine PAM360 is among the products AI models recommend first in Privileged access management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.