Every category where a model named Gemini Code Assist for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI coding assistants	Developer platform	2%	7 of 46	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by GitHub Copilot at 67%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Gemini Code Assist yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Gemini Code Assist across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend starting with Gemini Code Assist (most generous free tier) or GitHub Copilot Free” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI coding · budget prompt · first choice

“AWS/Google stack: Amazon Q or Gemini Code Assist ($19/user/mo).” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI coding · direct prompt · alternative

“Google Cloud shop? → Gemini Code Assist” Kimi K2 · AI coding · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Gemini Code Assist, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gemini Code Assist was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GitHub Copilot23 of 2316Not in the top three

Cursor20 of 232Not in the top three

Amazon Q Developer19 of 230Not in the top three

Tabnine18 of 231Not in the top three

Claude Code11 of 231Not in the top three

Windsurf8 of 231Not in the top three

Sourcegraph Cody5 of 230Not in the top three

Augment Code4 of 230Not in the top three

OpenAI Codex4 of 230Not in the top three

Aider3 of 230Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gemini Code Assist. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named Gemini Code Assist and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

axify.io14

augmentcode.com9

memeburn.com8

dev.to7

sourcegraph.com7

github.com6

learn.g2.com6

intuitionlabs.ai5

layer3labs.io5

omidsaffari.com5

Seventy-two of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Gemini Code Assist came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

axify.io/blog/the-best-ai-coding-assistants-a-full-comparison-of-20-tools14

memeburn.com/best-ai-coding-tools8

augmentcode.com/tools/beyond-github-copilot-5-enterprise-ready-ai-coding-assistants7

augmentcode.com/tools/8-top-ai-coding-assistants-and-their-best-use-cases6

learn.g2.com/best-ai-coding-assistants6

github.com/features/copilot/plans5

omidsaffari.com/blog/best-ai-coding-agents-for-enterprise5

resources.rework.com/tools/ai-tools/best-ai-coding-tools-20265

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gemini Code Assist's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gemini Code Assist, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at geminicodeassist.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.