IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › JetBrains AI Assistant · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

JetBrains AI Assistant

12Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. JetBrains AI Assistant was named 4 times in AI coding, where GitHub Copilot led with 67%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business19 of 45

under the label threshold

Mid-market17 of 46

under the label threshold

Enterprise7 of 47

under the label threshold

In ai coding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named JetBrains AI Assistant for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI coding assistants	Developer platform	0%	17 of 46	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by GitHub Copilot at 67%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for JetBrains AI Assistant yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated JetBrains AI Assistant across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as JetBrains AI Assistant, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JetBrains AI Assistant was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GitHub Copilot12 of 1211Not in the top three

Tabnine11 of 120Not in the top three

Amazon Q Developer8 of 120Not in the top three

Cursor5 of 120Not in the top three

Augment Code4 of 120Not in the top three

Sourcegraph Cody4 of 120Not in the top three

Claude Code3 of 120Not in the top three

Claude2 of 121Not in the top three

Aider2 of 120Not in the top three

Gemini Code Assist2 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named JetBrains AI Assistant. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 12 answers that named JetBrains AI Assistant and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

augmentcode.com5

axify.io3

agentic.ai2

checkthat.ai2

gartner.com2

intuitionlabs.ai2

jetbrains.comYour site2

memeburn.com2

adp.tencentcloud.com1

ai-agent-brief.com1

Twenty of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming JetBrains AI Assistant came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

augmentcode.com/tools/beyond-github-copilot-5-enterprise-ready-ai-coding-assistants5

augmentcode.com/tools/8-top-ai-coding-assistants-and-their-best-use-cases3

axify.io/blog/the-best-ai-coding-assistants-a-full-comparison-of-20-tools3

agentic.ai/best/enterprise-coding-agents2

augmentcode.com/guides/github-copilot-vs-amazon-q-enterprise-comparison2

augmentcode.com/tools/best-enterprise-ai-code-generators2

gartner.com/reviews/market/ai-code-assistants2

intuitionlabs.ai/articles/ai-code-assistants-large-codebases2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when JetBrains AI Assistant's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as JetBrains AI Assistant, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jetbrains.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.