AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Developer platform › AI coding › Cursor vs Tabnine
AI coding assistants · October 2026 Edition

Cursor vs Tabnine

One of fourteen models named Cursor first on the direct prompt; zero named Tabnine. Cursor was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Tabnine by eleven and Cursor carries 57 labels and Tabnine 33, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Cursor

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

Tabnine

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate19%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels5733A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Cursor reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.GitHub Copilot was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. GitHub Copilot vs Cursor · GitHub Copilot vs Tabnine · Windsurf vs Cursor

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI coding assistants page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CursorFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTabnine
Direct10
Paraphrase00
Comparative40
Budget-constrained013 against Cursor
Scale-constrained10
Negative058 against Cursor
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Cursor and Tabnine were named in the same answer eighty-seven times, of the 176 answers naming Cursor and the 119 naming Tabnine. In those answers Tabnine took the first choice thirteen times and Cursor ten.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Cursor and Tabnine stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Cursor Tabnine first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Cursor on the left and Tabnine on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Cursor and Tabnine stood in it.

Cursor first, Tabnine not the choice

1 of 14 modelsTabnine was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashCursor, GitHub Copilot alternatives: Claude Code

Neither was the first choice, one was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniGitHub Copilot alternatives: Cursor, JetBrains AI Assistant
Gemini 3.5 FlashGitHub Copilot alternatives: Augment Code, Cursor, Devin
Perplexity SonarGitHub Copilot alternatives: Augment Code, Claude Code, Cursor, Kilo Code
Grok 4.1 FastGitHub Copilot alternatives: Amazon Q Developer, Cursor, Gemini Code Assist, Tabnine
DeepSeek V4 FlashGitHub Copilot alternatives: Cursor, Windsurf
Kimi K2GitHub Copilot alternatives: Amazon Q Developer, Cursor, Tabnine
GLM 4.7 FlashXGitHub Copilot alternatives: Cursor, Tabnine, Windsurf
MiniMax M2.5GitHub Copilot alternatives: Cursor, Windsurf
GPT-6 LunaGitHub Copilot alternatives: Cursor, Gemini Code Assist
Muse Glimmer 30BGitHub Copilot alternatives: Amazon Q Developer, Augment Code, Cursor

Neither was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5GitHub Copilot alternatives: JetBrains AI Assistant
Mistral SmallGitHub Copilot
Llama 4 MaverickGitHub Copilot alternatives: Claude Code

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Cursor leads by eleven points.
Cursor13%#3 of 7
Tabnine2%#4 of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Cursor leads by two points.
Cursor4%#3 of 9
Tabnine2%#5 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Tabnine leads at enterprise.
Tabnine9%#2 of 9
Cursor0%#9 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Cursor

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Cursor says it sends prompts and code context to model providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google... If you're on an individual plan, the DPA does not apply.” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cursor, Replit, Windsurf, OpenAI Codex. Named in the 43.1% unauthorized file operations taxonomy and in the IDEsaster 100% vulnerable set.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cursor has bugs and inconsistent outputs, where the AI claims to have completed a task but hasn't actually done what it said” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cursor at $20-40/month offers the most sophisticated agent workflows with Composer mode, multi-file awareness, and autonomous coding capabilities.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“It earns the top overall ranking based on its whole-codebase context awareness, multi-file editing capabilities, and strong accuracy scores” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Select two of the above tools (e.g., GitHub Copilot and Cursor) and run a head-to-head pilot” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Tabnine

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“on-prem / local models such as Tabnine are repeatedly called out as the privacy champion because your code never leaves your infrastructure” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · first choice
“Prefer privacy-first tools like Tabnine (which can run locally/air-gapped and is trained only on permissively licensed code)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Amazon CodeWhisperer or Tabnine since they're free” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.