| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI coding assistants | Developer platform | 0% | 7 of 48 | 14% | 28 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI security platforms | Security operations | 0% | 214 of 233 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11% | |
| Enterprise AI assistants | Data platform | 0% | 132 of 145 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChatGPT at 25% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI coding | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 7 of 48 |
| Enterprise AI | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 132 of 145, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Claude Code when you want an agent that can plan and carry out larger changes on its own.” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI coding · comparative prompt · first choice
“highest SWE-bench Verified score (~72.5%) among coding assistants in 2026” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI coding · comparative prompt · first choice
“Use Claude Code if you are comfortable working in the terminal and need to refactor or test massive repositories quickly.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI coding · comparative prompt · alternative
“The Specialist / "Agentic" Choice: Claude Code (by Anthropic) ... Best For: Senior engineers and technical leads” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI coding · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“A Chinese state actor used Claude Code to autonomously breach approximately 30 organizations.” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI security · negative prompt · hard negative
“Claude Code when using third-party skill marketplaces. The ClawHub/ClawHavoc campaign shows high risk from unsanctioned skills.” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI coding · negative prompt · soft negative
“These are "agentic" tools that can execute shell commands... If misconfigured or over-trusted, they can cause significant damage” Mistral Small · AI coding · negative prompt · soft negative
“developers using Claude Code must be incredibly cautious when working in untrusted repositories” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI coding · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 81 of the 81 answers that named Claude Code and are not a share of its labels.
219 of the 219 domain citations in answers naming Claude Code came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 821 | undated | |||
| Blog | 376 | undated | |||
| Case study | 283 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 13 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 6 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated | |||
| News or press | 2 | undated |
Every page claude.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Claude Code's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: claude.com, claude.com/pricing, claude.com/contact-sales/security, claude.com/product/tag, claude.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Claude Code's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Claude Code, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Claude Code by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: