AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Claude Code · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Claude Code

81Judge labels
0First choices
21Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in AI coding for mid-market buyers
Rank 7 of 48 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 28 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Claude Code →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai coding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Claude Code for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI coding assistantsDeveloper platform0%7 of 4814%28accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
AI security platformsSecurity operations0%214 of 233100%1under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%
Enterprise AI assistantsData platform0%132 of 145100%1under 10 labels · led by ChatGPT at 25%

Movement

Since September 2026, Claude Code held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · AI coding · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 of 37, unchanged
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 7 of 43
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 → 41 of 49

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
AI coding0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 13 → 7 of 48
Enterprise AI0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 132 of 145, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Claude Code across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501012
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash02013
Perplexity Sonar02002
Grok 4.2001102
Mistral Small00112
DeepSeek V4 Flash11204
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.502103
GPT-6 Luna01012
Muse Glimmer 30B10023

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative30 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labelsNone
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative17 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative81 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Claude Code when you want an agent that can plan and carry out larger changes on its own.” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI coding · comparative prompt · first choice
“highest SWE-bench Verified score (~72.5%) among coding assistants in 2026” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI coding · comparative prompt · first choice
“Use Claude Code if you are comfortable working in the terminal and need to refactor or test massive repositories quickly.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI coding · comparative prompt · alternative
“The Specialist / "Agentic" Choice: Claude Code (by Anthropic) ... Best For: Senior engineers and technical leads” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI coding · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“A Chinese state actor used Claude Code to autonomously breach approximately 30 organizations.” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI security · negative prompt · hard negative
“Claude Code when using third-party skill marketplaces. The ClawHub/ClawHavoc campaign shows high risk from unsanctioned skills.” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI coding · negative prompt · soft negative
“These are "agentic" tools that can execute shell commands... If misconfigured or over-trusted, they can cause significant damage” Mistral Small · AI coding · negative prompt · soft negative
“developers using Claude Code must be incredibly cautious when working in untrusted repositories” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI coding · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Claude Code, over the 81 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Claude Code was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
GitHub Copilot79 of 8150Not among the top eight
Cursor74 of 8110Not among the top eight
Tabnine43 of 818Not among the top eight
Windsurf38 of 811Not among the top eight
Amazon Q Developer34 of 810Not among the top eight
Gemini Code Assist17 of 811Not among the top eight
Sourcegraph Cody13 of 811Not among the top eight
Devin13 of 810Not among the top eight
OpenAI Codex13 of 810Not among the top eight
Augment Code11 of 810Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Claude Code. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 81 of the 81 answers that named Claude Code and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

kilo.ai31
augmentcode.com30
tech-insider.org26
resources.rework.com23
sourcegraph.com21
dev.to20
daily.dev19
jellyfish.co18
zoer.ai17
docs.github.com14

219 of the 219 domain citations in answers naming Claude Code came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

claude.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Claude Code takes 0% of first choices and GitHub Copilot takes 75%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ai coding assistant”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ai coding assistants”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
550,000 a month (“claude code”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
9,804 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,090,945 a month
Searches its site ranks for
16,570 · 7,051 in the top three
Sites linking to it
66,862
Paid Google search
12 searches its ads show for, about 265 clicks and $1,889 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 94 text, 26 video · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2025, as Anthropic, PBC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 119 in the year, 1 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 7 of 48 in AI coding
Segment leader
75%
GitHub Copilot
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
81 answers
Its own site cited
in 81 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on claude.com
12,594
subdomains included
Content
1,511
counted in the table below
Documentation
3,958
Product · Integration
59 · 1,221
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer821undated
Blog376undated
Case study283undated
Webinar or virtual event13undated
Comparison6undated
Report or ebook4undated
Conference or event3undated
Template or tool3undated
News or press2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page claude.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Claude Code

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Claude Code; a claim can dispute any of them.
Claude Code (Anthropic Enterprise) 1Claude Code (by Anthropic) 1

Follow Claude Code

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Claude Code is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
included in all paid plans
For
people who work with Claude throughout the day
Customers named
Pictet
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Claude Code's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: claude.com, claude.com/pricing, claude.com/contact-sales/security, claude.com/product/tag, claude.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Claude Code's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Claude Code, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Claude Code by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Claude Code is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Claude Code, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at claude.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.