| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI coding assistants | Developer platform | 0% | 13 of 46 | 14% | 28 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Claude Code is the top-ranked AI coding tool in 2026, powered by Opus 4.6, scoring 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI coding · comparative prompt · first choice
“*top-performing terminal agent* ... Currently tops SWE-bench (~80%)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI coding · comparative prompt · first choice
“Tools like Cursor (~$20/user) or Claude Code score higher on context awareness and autonomy” MiniMax M2.5 · AI coding · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“add Claude Code as a metered second tool for the minority doing agentic work” Llama 4 Maverick · AI coding · scale prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Also affected by IDEsaster; 100% of tested tools vulnerable to attack chains” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI coding · negative prompt · hard negative
“Approach with Extreme Caution: "Agentic" Coding Assistants ... (such as Claude Code, Devin, Cursor, and Windsurf)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI coding · negative prompt · soft negative
“Over-eagerness: ... "fulfill requests too eagerly" — making changes you didn't ask for” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI coding · negative prompt · soft negative
“General Risks Across Most (e.g., Cursor, Claude Code, Replit AI)” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI coding · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 62 of the 71 answers that named Claude Code and are not a share of its labels.
178 of the 178 domain citations in answers naming Claude Code came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Claude Code's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Claude Code, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at claude.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.