AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Developer platform › AI coding › Windsurf vs Cursor
AI coding assistants · October 2026 Edition

Windsurf vs Cursor

Zero of fourteen models named Windsurf first on the direct prompt; one named Cursor. Windsurf was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Cursor by fourteen and Windsurf carries 34 labels and Cursor 57, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Windsurf

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Cursor

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share14%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%19%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels3457A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Windsurf reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.GitHub Copilot was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. GitHub Copilot vs Windsurf · GitHub Copilot vs Cursor · Windsurf vs Amazon Q Developer

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI coding assistants page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
WindsurfFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCursor
Direct01
Paraphrase00
Comparative04
Budget-constrained703 against Cursor
Scale-constrained01
Negative003 against Windsurf · 8 against Cursor
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Windsurf and Cursor were named in the same answer seventy-eight times, of the 97 answers naming Windsurf and the 176 naming Cursor. In those answers Cursor took the first choice eleven times and Windsurf twelve.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Windsurf and Cursor stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Windsurf Cursor first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Windsurf on the left and Cursor on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Windsurf and Cursor stood in it.

Cursor first, Windsurf not the choice

1 of 14 modelsWindsurf was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashCursor, GitHub Copilot alternatives: Claude Code

Neither was the first choice, one was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniGitHub Copilot alternatives: Cursor, JetBrains AI Assistant
Gemini 3.5 FlashGitHub Copilot alternatives: Augment Code, Cursor, Devin
Perplexity SonarGitHub Copilot alternatives: Augment Code, Claude Code, Cursor, Kilo Code
Grok 4.20GitHub Copilot alternatives: Amazon Q Developer, Cursor, Gemini Code Assist, Tabnine
DeepSeek V4 FlashGitHub Copilot alternatives: Cursor, Windsurf
Kimi K2GitHub Copilot alternatives: Amazon Q Developer, Cursor, Tabnine
GLM 4.7 FlashXGitHub Copilot alternatives: Cursor, Tabnine, Windsurf
MiniMax M2.5GitHub Copilot alternatives: Cursor, Windsurf
GPT-6 LunaGitHub Copilot alternatives: Cursor, Gemini Code Assist
Muse Glimmer 30BGitHub Copilot alternatives: Amazon Q Developer, Augment Code, Cursor

Neither was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5GitHub Copilot alternatives: JetBrains AI Assistant
Mistral SmallGitHub Copilot
Llama 4 MaverickGitHub Copilot alternatives: Claude Code

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Windsurf leads by six points.
Windsurf19%#2 of 7
Cursor13%#3 of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Windsurf leads by ten points.
Windsurf14%#2 of 9
Cursor4%#3 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Windsurf0%#7 of 9
Cursor0%#9 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Windsurf

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Cursor, Replit, Windsurf, OpenAI Codex. Named in the 43.1% unauthorized file operations taxonomy” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Augment and Windsurf did not issue swift fixes, leaving their users temporarily exposed.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Augment and Windsurf had not provided a fix update at the time of publication” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Codeium – best free unlimited usage ... Zero budget / proof of concept: Codeium free unlimited + Amazon Q Developer free tier” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“The best AI coding assistant for a company with a limited budget is Windsurf, which is priced at $15/month.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“The Top Pick for $0 Budget: Codeium ... is the strongest option for a budget-conscious team” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Cursor

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Cursor says it sends prompts and code context to model providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google... If you're on an individual plan, the DPA does not apply.” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cursor, Replit, Windsurf, OpenAI Codex. Named in the 43.1% unauthorized file operations taxonomy and in the IDEsaster 100% vulnerable set.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cursor has bugs and inconsistent outputs, where the AI claims to have completed a task but hasn't actually done what it said” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cursor at $20-40/month offers the most sophisticated agent workflows with Composer mode, multi-file awareness, and autonomous coding capabilities.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“It earns the top overall ranking based on its whole-codebase context awareness, multi-file editing capabilities, and strong accuracy scores” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Select two of the above tools (e.g., GitHub Copilot and Cursor) and run a head-to-head pilot” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.