AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Omni · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Omni

27Judge labels
4First choices
2Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Embedded analytics for enterprise buyers
Rank 9 of 72 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In embedded analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Omni for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Embedded analyticsData platform2%9 of 720%9under 10 labels · led by Metabase at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Omni yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Omni across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash22004
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels2
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative10 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained5 labels1
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Cube or Omni if you are building a modern SaaS application that needs scalable, highly secure multi-tenancy” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Embedded analytics · comparative prompt · first choice
“Omni is considered the best overall choice for governed embedded analytics with AI” Llama 4 Maverick · Embedded analytics · comparative prompt · first choice
“Omni is the best overall choice for governed embedded analytics with AI” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Embedded analytics · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Governed Metrics & Embedded AI: Omni” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Embedded analytics · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Omni, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Omni was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Luzmo17 of 273Not among the top eight
Looker17 of 272Not among the top eight
Tableau14 of 270Not among the top eight
Cube12 of 274Not among the top eight
Sisense12 of 271Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power BI Embedded12 of 270Not among the top eight
Embeddable11 of 272Not among the top eight
ThoughtSpot Embedded11 of 271Not among the top eight
Qrvey11 of 270Not among the top eight
GoodData10 of 272Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Omni. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 27 answers that named Omni and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

omni.coYour site27
cube.dev20
holistics.io18
luzmo.com16
zoho.com14
knowi.com13
domo.com12
embeddable.com11
thoughtspot.com11
qrvey.com10

125 of the 152 domain citations in answers naming Omni came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

omni.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Omni takes 2% of first choices and Metabase takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “embedded analytics platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “embedded analytics platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
110,000 a month (“omni”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
71,204 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 52,818 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,622 · 123 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,319
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
16 ads · 12 text, 3 video, 1 image · 14 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2025, as Omni Analytics Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 11 in the year, 5 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 72 in embedded analytics
Segment leader
22%
Metabase
First choices
4 across its categories
Named in
27 answers
Its own site cited
in 27 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on omni.co
1,495
subdomains included
Content
315
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,095
Product · Integration
1 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog181262026-09-28
Report or ebook53undated
Case study2832026-09-09
Conference or event2302025-06-18
Comparison1632026-08-21
News or press902026-04-23
Glossary or explainer302024-06-11
Template or tool1undated
Podcast or video102022-04-05
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page omni.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Omni

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Omni is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The AI analytics platform
For
Data teams
Free plan or trial
Free Trial omni.co
Certifications
Omni Platform Certification
Customers named
CriblPhotoroomBambooHRSWBCOrdermentumTrintZapnito
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, hosting

What Omni's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: omni.co, trust.omni.co, omni.co/platform, omni.co/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Omni's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Omni, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Omni by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Omni is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Omni, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at omni.co is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.