Every category where a model named CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Threat intelligence platforms	Security operations	0%	106 of 128	50%	4	under 10 labels · led by NordStellar at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Excellent if you're already on CrowdStrike endpoints” MiniMax M2.5 · Threat intel · scale prompt · alternative

“great for proactive threat hunting” MiniMax M2.5 · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“only makes sense if you already run Falcon endpoints everywhere” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“Scales well but leans enterprise.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Threat intel · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Recorded Future25 of 258Not in the top three

ThreatConnect18 of 251Not in the top three

Anomali ThreatStream12 of 250Not in the top three

MISP8 of 250Not in the top three

NordStellar7 of 256Not in the top three

Google Threat Intelligence7 of 251Not in the top three

AlienVault OTX6 of 250Not in the top three

Anomali6 of 250Not in the top three

SOCRadar5 of 251Not in the top three

OpenCTI5 of 250Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 25 answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

analyticsinsight.net16

learn.g2.com16

upguard.com16

esecurityplanet.com14

b2breviews.com12

shadowdragon.io8

tech-insider.org8

anomali.com7

cipherssecurity.com7

costbench.com7

111 of the 111 domain citations in answers naming CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-threat-intelligence-tools16

upguard.com/blog/best-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-vendors15

esecurityplanet.com/products/threat-intelligence-platforms14

b2breviews.com/threat-intelligence-platforms12

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/best-threat-intelligence-platforms10

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/10-best-threat-intelligence-platforms-in-20269

shadowdragon.io/resources/best-threat-intelligence-platforms8

tech-insider.org/recorded-future-vs-gti-vs-threatconnect-20268

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at crowdstrike.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.