Small business▼−13Since September 2026: 43% → 30%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
30%from 43% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 2 pointsRank 1 → 2 of 30
1 category · RankedConfigCat
116Judge labels
33First choices
10Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
32% in Feature flags for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 35 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
4 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 39 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ConfigCat →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business2 of 36
32%54 labels
endorsed leader
Mid-market3 of 35
16%39 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise3 of 34
12%23 labels
accepted challenger
In feature flags · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ConfigCat for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature flags | Developer platform | 16% | 3 of 35 | 8% | 39 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 17% → 16%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ConfigCat held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Feature flags · by segment
Mid-market▼−1Since September 2026: 17% → 16%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
16%from 17% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 3 of 33, unchanged
Enterprise▲+1Since September 2026: 13% → 14%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
14%from 13% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 32
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature flags | 17% | 16% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 17% → 16%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 of 35, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ConfigCat across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ConfigCat across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels12
Paraphrase12 labels3
Comparative27 labels9not counted in share
Budget-constrained25 labels15
Scale-constrained15 labels3
Negative16 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative116 labels in all, every segment counted; 33 of the 46 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd usually recommend ConfigCat if your main goal is reliable feature flags with lower complexity and predictable cost” GPT-5.4 mini · Feature flags · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“ConfigCat ⭐ Best for Mid-Market ... Start with ConfigCat if you want simple feature flags with predictable costs” Kimi K2 · Feature flags · direct prompt · first choice
“If I had to choose one for a budget-conscious company that still wants a polished product, I'd choose ConfigCat.” GPT-5.4 mini · Feature flags · budget prompt · first choice
“For a typical mid-market B2B company ... ConfigCat offers the best balance of features, cost, and simplicity.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Feature flags · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“It is noted as not a broad experimentation platform. Teams wanting measurement not only toggles tend to look elsewhere.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Feature flags · negative prompt · soft negative
“ConfigCat's hosted model may still be a risk for some regulated industries that require on-premises deployment” GPT-5.4 mini · Feature flags · negative prompt · soft negative
“ConfigCat has no built-in analytics” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Feature flags · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ConfigCat, over the 116 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ConfigCat was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ConfigCat, over the 116 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ConfigCat was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ConfigCat. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 107 of the 116 answers that named ConfigCat and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
growthbook.io83
flagsmith.com76
configcat.comYour site51
statsig.com51
guideflow.com46
harness.io43
posthog.com43
amplitude.com41
launchdarkly.com34
getunleash.io30
447 of the 498 domain citations in answers naming ConfigCat came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
configcat.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, ConfigCat takes 16% of first choices and Flagsmith takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
configcat.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, ConfigCat takes 16% of first choices and Flagsmith takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “feature flag platform”
6
Position for “feature flag platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“configcat”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,127 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 526 · 44 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,106
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
16%
rank 3 of 35 in feature flags
Segment leader
25%
Flagsmith
- First choices
- 33 across its categories
- Named in
- 116 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 107 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on configcat.com
632
subdomains included
Content
270
counted in the table below
Documentation
286
Product · Integration
1 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 230 | 8 | 2026-09-04 | Feature flags, IaC | |
| Glossary or explainer | 18 | 1 | 2026-08-12 | ||
| Case study | 14 | 0 | 2024-05-01 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 0 | 2026-06-19 | Feature flags | |
| Template or tool | 2 | 1 | 2026-07-15 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-04Feature flags in asp net core web api blog
- 2026-08-28Approval flow scheduled changes blog
- 2026-08-14Feature flags behind a proxy blog
- 2026-08-12What is ab testing glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-07How to use feature flags in godot blog
- 2026-08-05Fault tolerance in configcat sdks blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page configcat.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow ConfigCat
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ConfigCat is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ConfigCat is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Feature Flag Service for Teams
- For
- teams
- Price stated
- Forever Free $ 0 / mo, Pro $ 110 / mo, Smart $ 325 / mo, Enterprise $ 900 / mo, Dedicated $ 4,500 / mo configcat.com
- Starting price
- 0 configcat.com
- Free plan or trial
- Forever Free plan. No credit card required. configcat.com
- Integrations claimed
- 20 configcat.com · 19 configcat.com/pricing pages disagree
- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificationGDPRISO 27001:2022
- Hosting
- EUGlobalUSCanadaUKAustralia
- Customers named
- Speechifymodsy.comFieldAwareControlPointmedstudy.combooked4.usPortico
What ConfigCat's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: configcat.com, configcat.com/pricing, configcat.com/platform-engineering, configcat.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ConfigCat's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ConfigCat, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ConfigCat by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ConfigCat is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ConfigCat, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where ConfigCat is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where ConfigCat is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideConfigCat is among the products AI models recommend first in Feature flags this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.