Every category where a model named DevCycle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Feature flags	Developer platform	0%	9 of 31	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DevCycle yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DevCycle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	2	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative12 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained5 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Always prioritize platforms (like DevCycle, GrowthBook, and others) that support the OpenFeature standard.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Feature flags · negative prompt · first choice

“Choose DevCycle if you prioritize OpenFeature support and SDK-driven workflows.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feature flags · comparative prompt · alternative

“Provides a free tier and is OpenFeature-compatible, avoiding vendor lock-in.” Mistral Small · Feature flags · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DevCycle, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DevCycle was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Flagsmith24 of 261Not in the top three

ConfigCat23 of 267Not in the top three

Unleash21 of 263Not in the top three

LaunchDarkly20 of 266Not in the top three

Statsig19 of 261Not in the top three

PostHog18 of 262Not in the top three

GrowthBook18 of 260Not in the top three

Split9 of 260Not in the top three

Optimizely4 of 260Not in the top three

Harness FME3 of 260Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DevCycle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 26 answers that named DevCycle and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

harness.io14

amplitude.com12

growthbook.io12

statsig.com12

getunleash.io10

guideflow.com8

toolradar.com8

topickz.com8

configcat.com7

guptadeepak.com7

Ninety-eight of the ninety-eight domain citations in answers naming DevCycle came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

harness.io/blog/feature-flag-tools-compared-10-best-platforms-for-safer-releases13

amplitude.com/compare/top-feature-flag-solutions-for-product-teams10

topickz.com/list/best-feature-flags8

guideflow.com/blog/feature-flag-software7

guptadeepak.com/tools/top-5-feature-flag-management-tools-20267

statsig.com/blog/comparing-feature-flag-platform-costs7

configcat.com/blog/top-launchdarkly-alternatives6

getunleash.io/blog/feature-flag-tools-which-should-you-use-with-pricing6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DevCycle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DevCycle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at devcycle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.