Four of fourteen models named LaunchDarkly first on the direct prompt; four named ConfigCat. LaunchDarkly was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and ConfigCat by twelve and LaunchDarkly carries 64 labels and ConfigCat 39, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the feature flags page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, LaunchDarkly and ConfigCat were named in the same answer 100 times, of the 205 answers naming LaunchDarkly and the 116 naming ConfigCat. In those answers ConfigCat took the first choice thirty-six times and LaunchDarkly twenty-one.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“LaunchDarkly — Proceed with Eyes Wide Open ... Powerful but expensive and complex.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid LaunchDarkly for mid-market unless you have enterprise budget” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid LaunchDarkly — it's enterprise-focused with opaque pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · hard negative
“the best default choice is usually LaunchDarkly if your priority is mature feature management, governance, approvals, and enterprise-grade rollout controls” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“LaunchDarkly is the most full-featured of the bunch... Choose LaunchDarkly if you want the most mature all-in-one enterprise feature management platform.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“LaunchDarkly — The Enterprise Standard ... Considered the original market leader and the most feature-rich standalone flag platform.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“It is noted as not a broad experimentation platform. Teams wanting measurement not only toggles tend to look elsewhere.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“ConfigCat's hosted model may still be a risk for some regulated industries that require on-premises deployment” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“ConfigCat has no built-in analytics” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd usually recommend ConfigCat if your main goal is reliable feature flags with lower complexity and predictable cost” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“ConfigCat ⭐ Best for Mid-Market ... Start with ConfigCat if you want simple feature flags with predictable costs” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“If I had to choose one for a budget-conscious company that still wants a polished product, I'd choose ConfigCat.” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.