Every category where a model named Statsig for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Feature flags	Developer platform	9%	5 of 31	7%	42	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Statsig yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Statsig across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	3	0	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	2	0	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	5	0	0	6
Mistral Small	0	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	5	1	0	6
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	1	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	1	3
Kimi K2	1	3	1	0	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	2	0	1	5
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct15 labels1

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative30 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained23 labels4

Scale-constrained13 labels1

Negative16 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative106 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Best All-Rounder: Statsig ... Go with Statsig if you are building products that require frequent iterations and A/B testing. It is the most cost-effective” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Feature flags · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Choose Statsig if you want flags tightly connected to experiments and metrics without enterprise overhead.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feature flags · comparative prompt · first choice

“The best feature flag platform for a company with a limited budget is Statsig, Flagsmith, or GrowthBook.” Llama 4 Maverick · Feature flags · budget prompt · first choice

“Startups/Small Teams: Statsig (generous free tier, unlimited gates)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Feature flags · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“the acquisition introduces some long-term roadmap and pricing uncertainty for independent SaaS teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Feature flags · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“Younger than established players; some enterprises prefer a longer track record.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feature flags · negative prompt · soft negative

“DevOps / Self-Hosted Preferred | LaunchDarkly, Statsig (SaaS only)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Feature flags · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Statsig, over the 106 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Statsig was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LaunchDarkly96 of 10639Not in the top three

Unleash94 of 1068Not in the top three

Flagsmith87 of 1066Not in the top three

ConfigCat66 of 10622Not in the top three

GrowthBook62 of 1064Not in the top three

Split48 of 1060Not in the top three

PostHog45 of 1064Not in the top three

DevCycle19 of 1063Not in the top three

Optimizely14 of 1060Not in the top three

Harness FME13 of 1060Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Statsig. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 94 of the 106 answers that named Statsig and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

harness.io56

growthbook.io52

statsig.comYour site46

getunleash.io43

toolradar.com43

amplitude.com39

configcat.com34

guideflow.com34

guptadeepak.com34

launchdarkly.com31

366 of the 412 domain citations in answers naming Statsig came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

harness.io/blog/feature-flag-tools-compared-10-best-platforms-for-safer-releases54

toolradar.com/guides/best-feature-flag-tools35

guptadeepak.com/tools/top-5-feature-flag-management-tools-202634

configcat.com/blog/top-launchdarkly-alternatives25

guideflow.com/blog/feature-flag-software25

linkedin.com/pulse/best-feature-flag-management-tools-rajesh-kumar-j0doc25

topickz.com/list/best-feature-flags25

amplitude.com/compare/top-feature-flag-solutions-for-product-teams24

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Statsig's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Statsig, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at statsig.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.