Small business=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 → 7 of 30
1 category · RankedStatsig
131Judge labels
11First choices
20Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in Feature flags for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 35 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 47 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Statsig →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 36
5%42 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market5 of 35
11%47 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise4 of 34
4%42 labels
accepted challenger
In feature flags · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Statsig for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature flags | Developer platform | 11% | 5 of 35 | 9% | 47 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 9% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Statsig held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Feature flags · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 9% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 5 → 4 of 33
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 7 → 4 of 32
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature flags | 9% | 12% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 9% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 of 35, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Statsig across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Statsig across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels4
Paraphrase15 labels1
Comparative32 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained25 labels5
Scale-constrained16 labels1
Negative19 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative131 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you want zero cost + zero maintenance: Go with Statsig. It's the only platform offering truly unlimited feature flags on a free tier” Kimi K2 · Feature flags · budget prompt · first choice
“Widely considered the best all-rounder for startups and mid-size teams in recent years” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Feature flags · comparative prompt · first choice
“LaunchDarkly (if budget allows) or Statsig (if experimentation is a priority)” MiniMax M2.5 · Feature flags · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with Statsig if you want an all-rounder with experiments and analytics” Grok 4.20 · Feature flags · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“if you want a pure-play infrastructure flag tool, look elsewhere, as Statsig has pivoted heavily into Amplitude's analytics-first roadmap” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Feature flags · direct prompt · soft negative
“Statsig is still growing in enterprise governance, with RBAC and audit features that aren't as strong” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Feature flags · negative prompt · soft negative
“Free flags at any scale, but analytics-based pricing can add up” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Feature flags · scale prompt · soft negative
“Statsig — check the post-transition roadmap and contract.” GPT-6 Luna · Feature flags · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Statsig, over the 131 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Statsig was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Statsig, over the 131 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Statsig was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Statsig. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 125 of the 131 answers that named Statsig and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
growthbook.io94
flagsmith.com86
statsig.comYour site74
harness.io52
guideflow.com51
getunleash.io46
launchdarkly.com45
amplitude.com44
linkedin.com44
posthog.com44
506 of the 580 domain citations in answers naming Statsig came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
statsig.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Statsig takes 11% of first choices and Flagsmith takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
statsig.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Statsig takes 11% of first choices and Flagsmith takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “feature flag platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “feature flag platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 12,100 a month (“statsig”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 182 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 353,837 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 17,495 · 1,962 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,453
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 10 clicks and $176 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
11%
rank 5 of 35 in feature flags
Segment leader
25%
Flagsmith
- First choices
- 11 across its categories
- Named in
- 131 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 125 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on statsig.com
1,451
subdomains included
Content
598
counted in the table below
Documentation
792
Product · Integration
5 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 386 | 11 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 72 | 0 | 2022-06-14 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 56 | undated | |||
| Case study | 33 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 15 | 0 | 2025-06-10 | ||
| News or press | 14 | 0 | 2025-04-04 | ||
| Conference or event | 11 | 0 | 2023-08-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 0 | 2023-07-26 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2022-12-22 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Our take on ai for experimentation blog
- 2026-09-15Beyond the a b test blog version blog
- 2026-09-10Color commentary aug 26 blog
- 2026-08-31Z test on non normal distribution blog
- 2026-08-19Running faster tests part 2 blog
- 2026-08-11Pm roundtable prioritize experiments blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page statsig.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Statsig
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Statsig; a claim can dispute any of them.
Statsig (by Amplitude) 1
Follow Statsig
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Statsig is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Statsig is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The modern product development platform
- For
- your team
- Price stated
- the industry's most generous free tier or scalable enterprise pricing statsig.com
- Starting price
- Free statsig.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- the industry's most generous free tier statsig.com
- Certifications
- Statsig UniversitySOC 2 Type II
- Hosting
- EUUnited States
- Customers named
- OpenAIBrexAncestryNotionLimeWhatnotWizehireDoorDash
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Statsig's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: statsig.com, statsig.com/pricing, trust.statsig.com, statsig.com/features/metrics, statsig.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Statsig's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Statsig, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Statsig by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Statsig is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Statsig, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.