Small business▼−8Since September 2026: 16% → 8%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 30
1 category · RankedPostHog Feature Flags
80Judge labels
8First choices
9Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Feature flags for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 35 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 27 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of PostHog Feature Flags →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business3 of 36
9%46 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market7 of 35
5%27 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise34 of 34
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
In feature flags · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PostHog Feature Flags for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature flags | Developer platform | 5% | 7 of 35 | 7% | 27 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, PostHog Feature Flags held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Feature flags · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 of 33, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 26 → 32 of 32
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature flags | 6% | 4% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 of 35, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PostHog Feature Flags across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PostHog Feature Flags across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labels2
Comparative22 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels5
Scale-constrained11 labels1
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative80 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for Tool Consolidation & Generous Free Tier: PostHog... incredibly generous free tier of 1 million feature flag requests per month” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Feature flags · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with PostHog if you want to track data alongside your flags.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feature flags · budget prompt · first choice
“Best default for a budget-conscious company: PostHog.” GPT-6 Luna · Feature flags · budget prompt · first choice
“self-hostable open-source options such as Flagsmith, Unleash, PostHog, Flipt and GrowthBook for full control and zero vendor lock-in” Muse Glimmer 30B · Feature flags · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“PostHog experienced four separate incidents in 10 days (Oct 2025), totaling 14+ hours of cumulative impact on flag evaluations” Kimi K2 · Feature flags · negative prompt · soft negative
“the feature flagging capabilities in these platforms are often "second-class citizens" compared to dedicated tools” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Feature flags · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PostHog Feature Flags, over the 80 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PostHog Feature Flags was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PostHog Feature Flags, over the 80 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PostHog Feature Flags was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PostHog Feature Flags. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 77 of the 80 answers that named PostHog Feature Flags and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
growthbook.io66
flagsmith.com56
posthog.comYour site49
amplitude.com40
statsig.com38
harness.io36
guideflow.com34
configcat.com28
dupple.com27
getunleash.io26
351 of the 400 domain citations in answers naming PostHog Feature Flags came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
posthog.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PostHog Feature Flags takes 5% of first choices and Flagsmith takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
posthog.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PostHog Feature Flags takes 5% of first choices and Flagsmith takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “feature flag platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “feature flag platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“posthog feature flags”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 6 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 25,936 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,571 · 342 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 12,983
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
5%
rank 7 of 35 in feature flags
Segment leader
25%
Flagsmith
- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 80 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 77 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on posthog.com
13,453
subdomains included
Content
1,051
counted in the table below
Documentation
3,551
Product · Integration
15 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 345 | 17 | 2026-09-16 | Feature flags, ETL | |
| News or press | 195 | 11 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 175 | 0 | 2026-06-02 | Data warehouses, APM | |
| Conference or event | 157 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 58 | 1 | 2026-07-21 | Object storage | |
| Case study | 53 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 46 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 17 | 0 | 2023-12-19 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Archive news or press
- 2026-09-16Build or buy feature flags blog
- 2026-09-15Self driving loops blog
- 2026-09-14If ai writes all the code whats left news or press
- 2026-09-09Irl events blog
- 2026-09-09Multimodal models need video blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- October 6, 2026SFTechWeek: AI Agents Builder Night with PostHog and FriendsHogpatch, San Francisco · hosted
- October 2, 2026Self-Driving Cafe: Madrid w/ PostHogOsom Salamanca, Madrid, Spain · hosted
As the event pages on posthog.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page posthog.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as PostHog Feature Flags
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PostHog Feature Flags; a claim can dispute any of them.
PostHog 27
Follow PostHog Feature Flags
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
PostHog Feature Flags is its own company.ShowHide
The company
PostHog Feature Flags is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Per-product usage-based pricing with a generous free monthly allowance
- For
- AI-pilled software teams
- Price stated
- Free tier: 1 million requests/mo Pricing: $0.0001/request posthog.com
- Starting price
- 0 posthog.com
- Free plan or trial
- 1 million requests/mo posthog.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IISOC 2GDPRCCPAHIPAAHIPAA BAA
- Hosting
- US (Virginia)EU (Frankfurt)USA (PostHog US Cloud)Germany (PostHog EU Cloud)USAGermanyEUGlobal
- Customers named
- AirbusArenaElevenLabsExaHasuraHeyGenMistral AIRaycast
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What PostHog Feature Flags's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: posthog.com, posthog.com/pricing, trust.posthog.com, posthog.com/platform-packages, posthog.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PostHog Feature Flags's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PostHog Feature Flags, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PostHog Feature Flags by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PostHog Feature Flags is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PostHog Feature Flags, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.