Every category where a model named GrowthBook for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Feature flags	Developer platform	6%	6 of 31	2%	40	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for GrowthBook yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated GrowthBook across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	1	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	5	0	0	6
Perplexity Sonar	0	3	2	0	5
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	1	0	4
Mistral Small	0	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2	0	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	1	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	3	2	0	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	0	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	3	0	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct18 labels1

Paraphrase7 labelsNone

Comparative23 labelsNone

Budget-constrained21 labels5

Scale-constrained8 labelsNone

Negative21 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative98 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For a typical mid-market B2B team, GrowthBook offers the best balance of capability, affordability, and flexibility” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Feature flags · direct prompt · first choice

“Always prioritize platforms (like DevCycle, GrowthBook, and others) that support the OpenFeature standard.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Feature flags · negative prompt · first choice

“The best feature flag platform for a company with a limited budget is Statsig, Flagsmith, or GrowthBook.” Llama 4 Maverick · Feature flags · budget prompt · first choice

“Best overall for a tight budget: GrowthBook” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Feature flags · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Advanced governance and stats features vary by plan; may need upgrades for stricter requirements.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feature flags · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as GrowthBook, over the 98 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GrowthBook was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Flagsmith89 of 988Not in the top three

LaunchDarkly84 of 9830Not in the top three

Unleash79 of 986Not in the top three

ConfigCat66 of 9825Not in the top three

Statsig62 of 988Not in the top three

PostHog54 of 988Not in the top three

Split38 of 981Not in the top three

DevCycle18 of 981Not in the top three

Optimizely14 of 980Not in the top three

Harness FME10 of 980Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GrowthBook. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 85 of the 98 answers that named GrowthBook and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

growthbook.ioYour site65

harness.io63

getunleash.io46

statsig.com43

amplitude.com42

toolradar.com42

guptadeepak.com39

guideflow.com34

configcat.com31

launchdarkly.com31

371 of the 436 domain citations in answers naming GrowthBook came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

harness.io/blog/feature-flag-tools-compared-10-best-platforms-for-safer-releases62

guptadeepak.com/tools/top-5-feature-flag-management-tools-202639

toolradar.com/guides/best-feature-flag-tools35

amplitude.com/compare/best-feature-flag-tools28

amplitude.com/compare/top-feature-flag-solutions-for-product-teams26

guideflow.com/blog/feature-flag-software26

topickz.com/list/best-feature-flags24

linkedin.com/pulse/best-feature-flag-management-tools-rajesh-kumar-j0doc22

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GrowthBook's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GrowthBook, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at growthbook.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.