Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 31 → 10 of 30
Harness · 1 category · RankedHarness FME
22Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Feature flags for enterprise buyers
Rank 10 of 35 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business10 of 36
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market10 of 35
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise12 of 34
0%12 labels
accepted challenger
In feature flags · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Harness FME for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature flags | Developer platform | 0% | 10 of 35 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Flagsmith at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Harness FME held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Feature flags · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 11 of 33
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 of 32, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature flags | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 10 of 35 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Harness FME across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Harness FME across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Harness FME excels for companies already using the Harness CI/CD ecosystem” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Feature flags · scale prompt · alternative
“Other options to consider are Harness Fme (split) and Kameleoon” Llama 4 Maverick · Feature flags · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Harness FME, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Harness FME was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Harness FME, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Harness FME was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Harness FME. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named Harness FME and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
growthbook.io15
flagsmith.com14
harness.ioYour site13
guptadeepak.com11
statsig.com9
getunleash.io7
configcat.com6
guideflow.com6
launchdarkly.com6
linkedin.com6
Eighty of the ninety-three domain citations in answers naming Harness FME came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
harness.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Harness FME takes 0% of first choices and Flagsmith takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
harness.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Harness FME takes 0% of first choices and Flagsmith takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “feature flag platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “feature flag platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“harness fme”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Its company's site
- harness.io shared with Harness's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 86,302 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 11,466 · 746 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,641
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 10 of 35 in feature flags
Segment leader
25%
Flagsmith
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 22 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Harness FME
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Harness FME; a claim can dispute any of them.
Harness FME (Split) 2Harness FME/formerly Split 1Harness Feature Management 1Harness Feature Management & Experimentation 1Harness Feature Management & Experimentation (formerly Split.io) 1Harness Fme (split) 1
Follow Harness FME
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Harness is the company behind Harness FME.ShowHide
The company
Harness is the company behind Harness FME.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- offers clear, consistent pricing, powerful experimentation, and advanced feature management
- For
- LaunchDarkly
- Price stated
- clear, consistent pricing; 6 months free; free professional services; subscribe for 12 months harness.io/demo/switch-to-fme
- Free plan or trial
- 6 months free harness.io/demo/switch-to-fme
- Customers named
- Adobe WorkfrontADP
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Harness FME's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: harness.io/demo/switch-to-fme, harness.io/comparison-guide/datadog-vs-harness-fme, harness.io/comparison-guide/amplitude-vs-harness-fme, harness.io/resources/better-together-with-harness-fme, community.harness.io/t/how-do-i-get-started-with-harness-fme/686. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Harness FME's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Harness FME, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Harness FME by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Harness FME is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Harness FME, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.