One category · what the models named insteadAlternatives to Cofense PhishMe, as AI models named them
In the October 2026 Edition, 226 of the 252 answers collected in the one category where Cofense PhishMe holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.
Security awareness training
Eighty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name Cofense PhishMe; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-four answers, seventeen products in all, the eight most named:
Seventy-four of the eighty-four answers did not name Cofense PhishMe; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-four answers, twelve products in all, the eight most named:
Sixty-eight of the eighty-four answers did not name Cofense PhishMe; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those sixty-eight answers, seven products in all:
How to read this
A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Cofense PhishMe neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Cofense PhishMe only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Cofense PhishMe's side.
Every answer and every label behind these figures is in the record, sent on request. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Cofense PhishMe was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.