Small business▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 19 → 7 of 62
2 categories · Named, not rankedDefendify
9Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Defendify was named 3 times in Awareness training and 1 other category, where KnowBe4 led with 45%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 70
4%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market30 of 64
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise33 of 55
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In awareness training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Defendify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security awareness training | Security operations | 0% | 30 of 64 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by KnowBe4 at 45% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Penetration testing as a service | Security operations | 0% | 42 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Cobalt at 45% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Defendify held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Awareness training · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 → 28 of 62
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 of 50, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness training | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 of 64, unchanged |
| PTaaS | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 82, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Defendify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Defendify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels2
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you can spend a bit more and want a more established service package, Defendify or Andersen/ScienceSoft are stronger choices.” Perplexity Sonar · PTaaS · budget prompt · alternative
“$250/month (unlimited users) | Small businesses wanting all-in-one security” Kimi K2 · Awareness training · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Defendify, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Defendify was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Defendify, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Defendify was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Defendify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Defendify and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com6
defendify.comYour site4
expertinsights.com4
guideflow.com3
adaptivesecurity.com2
cloudsek.com2
cyberpress.org2
gartner.com2
guardey.com2
guptadeepak.com2
Twenty-five of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Defendify came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on defendify.com
959
subdomains included
Content
644
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
0 · 238
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 344 | 1 | 2026-08-04 | MDR, Awareness training | |
| News or press | 197 | 2 | 2026-08-11 | MDR | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 54 | 2 | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Conference or event | 19 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 15 | undated | GRC | ||
| Report or ebook | 7 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 4 | 2 | 2026-09-02 | MDR, EDR | |
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-02Mdr vs edr vs xdr comparison
- 2026-08-28The accidental ciso how it leaders can reduce security debt and make better security decisionssec webinar or virtual event
- 2026-08-12Mdr vs mssp comparison
- 2026-08-11Defendify earns third straight inc 5000 honor by making enterprise grade cybersecurity accessible to all organizations news or press
- 2026-08-07Water pr news or press
- 2026-08-04Soc as a service what it is and how it works in 2026 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page defendify.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Defendify
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Defendify is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Defendify is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- All-In-One Cybersecurity® Platform; the cybersecurity platform for IT teams
- For
- IT teams
- Price stated
- starting at $925 / month; starting at $325 / month; starting at $150 / month; starting at $450 / month defendify.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 925 defendify.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try for free defendify.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 compliant
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting, customers
What Defendify's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: defendify.com, defendify.com, defendify.com/pricing, defendify.com/security, defendify.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Defendify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Defendify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Defendify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Defendify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Defendify, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.