Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 21 → 7 of 58
2 categories · RankedCloudanix
25Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in CNAPP for small business buyers
Rank 32 of 70 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 61
2%11 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market32 of 70
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise29 of 38
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In cnapp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Cloudanix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud-native application protection | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 32 of 70 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cloud security posture management | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 50 of 80 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Cloudanix held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CNAPP · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 → 29 of 68
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNAPP | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 32 of 70 |
| CSPM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 50 of 80 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Cloudanix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Cloudanix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative6 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Other budget-friendly options include Cloudanix, which provides CSPM, CIEM, CWPP, and CNAPP capabilities” Mistral Small · CNAPP · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cloudanix, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cloudanix was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cloudanix, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cloudanix was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cloudanix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named Cloudanix and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cyberpress.org23
gbhackers.com18
g2.com15
sourceforge.net14
cloudaware.com12
complyjet.com11
us.fitgap.com11
aikido.dev9
slashdot.org9
itechguides.com8
130 of the 130 domain citations in answers naming Cloudanix came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cloudanix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cloudanix takes 0% of first choices and Wiz takes 37%.ShowHide
Search and answers
cloudanix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cloudanix takes 0% of first choices and Wiz takes 37%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “cnapp”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cnapps”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 40 a month (“cloudanix”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 808 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 984 · 2 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 857
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 32 of 70 in CNAPP
Segment leader
37%
Wiz
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 25 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 25 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on cloudanix.com
78,572
subdomains included
Content
445
counted in the table below
Documentation
5,759
Product · Integration
76 · 9
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 165 | 63 | 2026-09-21 | CSPM, CNAPP | |
| Glossary or explainer | 107 | 1 | 2026-09-08 | MFA, DLP | |
| Podcast or video | 98 | 1 | 2026-07-10 | GRC, DLP | |
| Comparison | 37 | 6 | 2026-09-15 | CSPM, CNAPP | |
| Report or ebook | 21 | 0 | 2023-04-28 | ||
| Case study | 9 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 5 | 2 | 2026-09-13 | ||
| News or press | 3 | 2 | 2026-08-20 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Why your developers shouldnt see raw production pii and how to prevent it blog
- 2026-09-21Compliance blog
- 2026-09-21Data security blog
- 2026-09-21Devsecops blog
- 2026-09-20Iam blog
- 2026-09-18Building a custom compliance framework on cis and nist a practical guide blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cloudanix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Cloudanix
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Cloudanix is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Cloudanix is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Code to Cloud Security Platform
- For
- security teams
- Price stated
- Code, Cloud, Access, and Agentic — each with published Pro pricing and Enterprise options. cloudanix.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 3.49 cloudanix.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start your free trial now. cloudanix.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2ISO 27001AWS Security CompetencyHIPAAPCICMMC 2.0 Level 2 certificationHITRUST CSF certificationSOC 2 Type II compliance
- Hosting
- USEUIndiaMECloudPrem in your VPC
- Customers named
- Airgap NetworksiMochaHugoHubFinfinityTech InspiraKapittxMeeshoEversana
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Cloudanix's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cloudanix.com, cloudanix.com/pricing, cloudanix.com/compliance, cloudanix.com/platform, cloudanix.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cloudanix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cloudanix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cloudanix by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Cloudanix is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cloudanix, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.