AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Prowler · October 2026 Edition
4 categories · Ranked

Prowler

81Judge labels
18First choices
7Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
18% in CSPM for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 80 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Prowler →
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In cspm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Prowler for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Cloud security posture managementCloud and infrastructure13%4 of 8014%14accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 16% → 13%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Cloud-native application protectionCloud and infrastructure1%8 of 700%4under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 37%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Compliance automationSecurity operations0%36 of 6733%3under 10 labels · led by Drata at 34%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Data security posture managementSecurity operations0%37 of 1050%2under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview at 18%

Movement

Since September 2026, Prowler held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · CSPM · by segment

Small business▼−6Since September 2026: 27% → 21%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
21%from 27% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 2 → 1 of 69
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 16% → 13%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 2 → 4 of 73
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 28 → 20 of 46

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
CSPM16%13%▼−3Since September 2026: 16% → 13%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 2 → 4 of 80
CNAPP0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 8 of 70, unchanged
Compliance automation0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 36 of 67, unchanged
DSPM0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 37 of 105, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Prowler across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510102
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash12003
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2001012
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash10012
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10012
Kimi K211103
GLM 4.7 FlashX03003
MiniMax M2.511002
GPT-6 Luna10001
Muse Glimmer 30B12003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels1
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative11 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained38 labels16
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative9 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative81 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For the tightest budgets, open-source tools like Prowler or Microsoft Defender for Cloud's free tier are excellent starting points.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CSPM · budget prompt · first choice
“start with your cloud provider's built-in CSPM, and add Prowler OSS if you need broader or multi-cloud checks” GPT-6 Luna · CSPM · budget prompt · first choice
“Prowler as your primary CSPM tool - it's comprehensive, free, and covers all major cloud providers” MiniMax M2.5 · CSPM · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have $0: Use Prowler (for AWS) or Microsoft Defender Foundation (for Azure).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CSPM · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“they're limited to scanning—not full GRC automation, evidence collection, or audit prep” Grok 4.20 · Compliance automation · budget prompt · soft negative
“self-hosting open-source CSPM tools requires significant maintenance” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CSPM · negative prompt · soft negative
“excellent for audits but not continuous production monitoring” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CSPM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Prowler, over the 80 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Prowler was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Aikido Security23 of 8010Not among the top eight
Datadog Cloud Security Management15 of 800Not among the top eight
Google Security Command Center14 of 802Not among the top eight
Cloudanix14 of 801Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security12 of 800Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Prowler. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 77 of the 80 answers that named Prowler and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org49
g2.com48
gbhackers.com35
complyjet.com34
us.fitgap.com30
orca.security26
cloudaware.com25
sourceforge.net25
aikido.dev23
wiz.io23

318 of the 318 domain citations in answers naming Prowler came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

prowler.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Prowler takes 13% of first choices and Wiz takes 37%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “cloud security posture management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cloud security posture management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
40,500 a month (“prowler”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
6,189 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 671 a month
Searches its site ranks for
480 · 22 in the top three
Sites linking to it
581
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
13%
rank 4 of 80 in CSPM
Segment leader
37%
Wiz
First choices
18 across its categories
Named in
80 answers
Its own site cited
in 77 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on prowler.com
339
subdomains included
Content
72
counted in the table below
Documentation
193
Product · Integration
3 · 4
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog51undatedCSPM, MFA
Conference or event12undated
Comparison502026-06-30
Glossary or explainer302026-04-04CSPM
Report or ebook1undated

Most recent

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on prowler.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page prowler.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Prowler

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Prowler; a claim can dispute any of them.
Prowler (Open Source) 3CloudSploit/Prowler 1Prowler Cloud (SaaS) 1Prowler OSS 1

Follow Prowler

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Prowler is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
the open-source cloud security platform
For
teams
Price stated
Managed SaaS ### Prowler Cloud Hosted and maintained by Prowler - Continuous monitoring with auto-scaling scans - Continuous compliance - Lighthouse AI, Slack and Jira integrations - MCP Server for your AI agents - 15-day free trial, no cloud account limit prowler.com
Starting price
$0 prowler.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
15-day free trial, no cloud account limit prowler.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIAWS Foundational Technical ReviewSOC 2 Type 2
Customers named
Syntro
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting

What Prowler's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: prowler.com, prowler.com/pricing, prowler.com/use-cases/infrastructure-as-code, prowler.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Prowler's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Prowler, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Prowler by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Prowler is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Prowler, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at prowler.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.