IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Cisco Secure Endpoint · September 2026 Edition

Cisco · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Cisco Secure Endpoint

11Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Cisco Secure Endpoint was named 6 times in EDR and 1 other category, where Bitdefender GravityZone led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market41 of 54

under the label threshold

Enterprise29 of 50

under the label threshold

In edr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cisco Secure Endpoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Endpoint detection and response	Security operations	0%	41 of 54	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Bitdefender GravityZone at 20%
Endpoint protection	IT operations and endpoint	0%	62 of 99	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Cloud at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cisco Secure Endpoint yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cisco Secure Endpoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“97-98% protection; poor MITRE (30-56%); 0-11 false alarms but inconsistent.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Endpoint protection · negative prompt · soft negative

“Be Cautious About UI/UX and Integration” Qwen 3.7 Flash · EDR · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cisco Secure Endpoint, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cisco Secure Endpoint was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CrowdStrike Falcon8 of 112Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint8 of 111Not in the top three

SentinelOne Singularity7 of 111Not in the top three

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR5 of 110Not in the top three

Sophos Intercept X4 of 110Not in the top three

Trend Micro4 of 110Not in the top three

Bitdefender3 of 111Not in the top three

Bitdefender GravityZone3 of 110Not in the top three

Cynet3 of 110Not in the top three

SentinelOne3 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cisco Secure Endpoint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 11 answers that named Cisco Secure Endpoint and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

decryptiondigest.com3

gbhackers.com3

reddit.com3

docs.broadcom.com2

g2.com2

gartner.com2

iru.com2

kaseya.com2

sentinelone.com2

sophos.com2

Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Cisco Secure Endpoint came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gbhackers.com/best-edr-solutions-compared3

docs.broadcom.com/doc/kuppingercole-leadership-compass-endpoint-protection-detection-and-r2

gartner.com/reviews/market/endpoint-protection-platforms2

gbhackers.com/best-business-antivirus-compared2

iru.com/endpoint/compare/endpoint-security-software2

reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/1cylpyf/which_of_these_edr_solutions_would_be_the_best2

start.paloaltonetworks.com/gartner-epp-mq2

worldmetrics.org/best/endpoint-protection-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Cisco Secure Endpoint

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cisco Secure Endpoint; a claim can dispute any of them.

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly AMP) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cisco Secure Endpoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cisco Secure Endpoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cisco.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.