Index › Vendors › Box Shield · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Box Shield

7Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Box Shield was named 3 times in DLP, where Microsoft Purview DLP led with 39%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business9 of 68

under the label threshold

Mid-market23 of 84

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In dlp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Box Shield for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Data loss prevention	Security operations	0%	23 of 84	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview DLP at 39%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Box Shield yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Box Shield across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Low-Cost Cloud Storage Protection: Box Shield” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DLP · budget prompt · alternative

“includes a free plan, with paid tiers starting at $5/month” Mistral Small · DLP · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“the cheapest dedicated option found, but limited to Box content specifically” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DLP · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Box Shield, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Box Shield was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Nightfall AI7 of 73Not in the top three

CurrentWare7 of 70Not in the top three

Microsoft Purview DLP5 of 73Not in the top three

Netwrix Endpoint Protector4 of 70Not in the top three

Safetica4 of 70Not in the top three

MyDLP2 of 70Not in the top three

OpenDLP2 of 70Not in the top three

Symantec Data Loss Prevention2 of 70Not in the top three

Microsoft 3651 of 71Not in the top three

Falcongaze SecureTower1 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Box Shield. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Box Shield and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

currentware.com7

gartner.com7

spotsaas.com7

learn.g2.com5

comparitech.com4

reddit.com4

g2.com3

kitecyber.com3

miniorange.com3

nightfall.ai3

No domain is on file for Box Shield, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

currentware.com/blog/best-data-loss-prevention-software7

gartner.com/reviews/market/data-loss-prevention7

spotsaas.com/list/data-loss-prevention--dlp--software/for-small-business7

learn.g2.com/best-data-loss-prevention-software5

comparitech.com/data-privacy-management/data-loss-prevention-tools-software4

miniorange.com/blog/top-data-loss-prevention-tools3

nightfall.ai/pricing3

reddit.com/r/msp/comments/1gyw1dm/affordable_dlp_for_a_small_office3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Box Shield's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Box Shield, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.