IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Apache Hop · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Apache Hop

6Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Apache Hop was named 1 time in ETL, where Airbyte led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business49 of 56

under the label threshold

Mid-market36 of 66

under the label threshold

Enterprise45 of 67

under the label threshold

In etl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Apache Hop for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ETL and ELT	Data platform	0%	36 of 66	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Airbyte at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Apache Hop yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Apache Hop across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Apache Hop, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Apache Hop was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Airbyte6 of 61Not in the top three

Fivetran6 of 60Not in the top three

Hevo Data5 of 63Not in the top three

Stitch5 of 60Not in the top three

Skyvia4 of 62Not in the top three

Talend4 of 60Not in the top three

Apache NiFi3 of 60Not in the top three

Coupler.io3 of 60Not in the top three

Informatica3 of 60Not in the top three

Meltano3 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Apache Hop. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 6 answers that named Apache Hop and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hevodata.com5

coalesce.io3

fivetran.com3

integrate.io3

airbyte.com2

bladepipe.com2

checkthat.ai2

dataexpert.io2

estuary.dev2

funnel.io2

Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Apache Hop came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

coalesce.io/all-things-data/hidden-costs-of-etl-tools3

hevodata.com/learn/etl-tools-for-small-businesses3

dataexpert.io/blog/open-source-etl-tools-comparison-guide-20262

fivetran.com/learn/etl-tools-20242

funnel.io/blog/etl-tools2

g2.com/categories/etl-tools/small-business2

hevodata.com/learn/affordable-etl-tools2

hevodata.com/learn/etl-solutions-cost2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Apache Hop's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Apache Hop, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at apache.org is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.