Every category where a model named Skyvia for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ETL and ELT	Data platform	0%	15 of 66	0%	10	accepted challenger
Data warehouses	Data platform	0%	21 of 41	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Snowflake at 47%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Skyvia yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Skyvia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels2

Paraphrase13 labels2

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained10 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative5 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“compatible with their existing infrastructure and has minimal friction, Skyvia could be a good choice” Llama 4 Maverick · Data warehouses · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“worth considering for no-code teams needing affordable fixed plans starting at $79/month” Perplexity Sonar · ETL · budget prompt · alternative

“Need a quick ETL for a data warehouse | Skyvia (free tier)” MiniMax M2.5 · ETL · budget prompt · alternative

“Best if budget is tight and needs are basic: Skyvia” Perplexity Sonar · ETL · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Skyvia, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Skyvia was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Airbyte43 of 4914Not in the top three

Hevo Data42 of 4911Not in the top three

Fivetran32 of 492Not in the top three

Stitch28 of 496Not in the top three

Coupler.io20 of 491Not in the top three

Integrate.io14 of 493Not in the top three

Talend10 of 491Not in the top three

dbt10 of 490Not in the top three

Matillion9 of 490Not in the top three

Apache Airflow8 of 491Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Skyvia. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 44 of the 49 answers that named Skyvia and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

skyvia.comYour site38

hevodata.com35

integrate.io30

bladepipe.com27

g2.com20

fivetran.com14

sqream.com14

reddit.com13

datacamp.com12

estuary.dev12

177 of the 215 domain citations in answers naming Skyvia came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

skyvia.com/blog/best-etl-tools-for-small-businesses31

hevodata.com/learn/etl-tools-for-small-businesses25

bladepipe.com/blog/data_insights/best_etl_tool_for_small_business24

integrate.io/blog/top-7-etl-tools21

g2.com/categories/etl-tools/small-business17

sqream.com/blog/best-etl-tools14

datacamp.com/blog/a-list-of-the-16-best-etl-tools-and-why-to-choose-them12

learn.g2.com/best-etl-tools12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Skyvia's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Skyvia, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at skyvia.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.