Every category where a model named Hostinger for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cloud hosting	Cloud and infrastructure	7%	5 of 78	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by Amazon Web Services at 29%
Object storage	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	40 of 46	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Backblaze B2 at 46%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Hostinger yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Hostinger across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labels6

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative8 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Hostinger is the strongest general pick if you want the best mix of low cost and usable cloud performance” Perplexity Sonar · Cloud hosting · budget prompt · first choice

“For an easy, managed experience at low cost, Hostinger is the safest pick.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cloud hosting · budget prompt · first choice

“Hostinger is consistently rated as the Best Budget option” Kimi K2 · Cloud hosting · budget prompt · first choice

“Non-technical teams wanting support: `Hostinger Cloud` (`~$7.19/mo`)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cloud hosting · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Hyper-Budget VPS Object Storage (e.g., Contabo, Hostinger) ... they are highly discouraged for production workloads” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Object storage · negative prompt · hard negative

“Reports of unjust account suspensions and denial of backup access leading to significant data loss” Kimi K2 · Cloud hosting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Hostinger, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hostinger was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Amazon Web Services20 of 261Not in the top three

DigitalOcean16 of 265Not in the top three

Google Cloud14 of 260Not in the top three

Cloudways13 of 262Not in the top three

Kamatera12 of 262Not in the top three

Vultr12 of 261Not in the top three

Azure10 of 260Not in the top three

Hetzner8 of 264Not in the top three

SiteGround8 of 262Not in the top three

Akamai Connected Cloud8 of 260Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hostinger. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 26 answers that named Hostinger and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hostingadvice.com16

techradar.com13

forbes.com12

cybernews.com9

digitalocean.com8

hostadvice.com8

newsweek.com8

atlantic.net6

geekflare.com6

reddit.com6

Ninety-two of the ninety-two domain citations in answers naming Hostinger came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

techradar.com/news/best-cloud-hosting-providers13

hostingadvice.com/how-to/best-business-cloud-hosting9

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-cloud-hosting8

hostingadvice.com/how-to/best-cheap-cloud-hosting8

hostingadvice.com/how-to/cloud-hosting-cost8

newsweek.com/vault/small-business/best-cloud-hosting-services8

cybernews.com/best-web-hosting/cheap-cloud-hosting6

geekflare.com/hosting/best-cloud-hosting-platforms6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Hostinger

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Hostinger; a claim can dispute any of them.

Hostinger (Cloud Startup) 1Hostinger Cloud 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hostinger's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hostinger, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hostinger.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.