Index › IT operations and endpoint › Process mining › Celonis Process Intelligence Platform vs PM4Py
Process mining · October 2026 Edition
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform vs PM4Py
Two of fourteen models named Celonis Process Intelligence Platform first on the direct prompt; zero named PM4Py. Celonis Process Intelligence Platform was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and PM4Py by ten and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform carries 64 labels and PM4Py 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
PM4Py
criticized challengerNamed in one category this edition.
First-choice share3%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate52%29%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels6414A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UiPath Process Mining was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Apromore vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform · Apromore vs PM4Py · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPM4PyDirect209 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Paraphrase006 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Comparative130
Budget-constrained015 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Scale-constrained003 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Negative0010 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform · 4 against PM4Py
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Celonis Process Intelligence Platform and PM4Py stood in it.
| Model | DirectPM | ParaphrasePM | ComparativePM | Budget-constrainedPM | Scale-constrainedPM | NegativePM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | PM | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | PM | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | PM | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | PM | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | PM | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | PM | PM | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | PM | | PM |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | PM | PM | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | PM | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | PM | PM | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformPM PM4Py first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform on the left and PM4Py on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Celonis Process Intelligence Platform and PM4Py stood in it.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform first, PM4Py not the choice
2 of 14 modelsPM4Py was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallCelonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniUiPath Process Mining alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, ProcessMind, QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, KYP.ai, UiPath Process Mining
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Grok 4.1 FastMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Minit, ProcessMind
Llama 4 MaverickProcessMaker
Qwen 3.7 FlashEverflow Process Intelligence, ProcessMaker alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Kimi K2Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, MEHRWERK, QPR ProcessAnalyzer
GLM 4.7 FlashXMindzie alternatives: ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate
GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Muse Glimmer 30BDecisions, ProcessMaker alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Noxus
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform leads by four points.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform4%#7 of 12PM4Py0%#11 of 12
The full small business standing →Mid-marketThe figures above
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform leads by two points.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform3%#7 of 9PM4Py2%#8 of 9
The full mid-market standing →Enterprise
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform leads by sixty-seven points.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform67%#1 of 8PM4Py0%#– of 8
The full enterprise standing →What the models said about Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid (Unless You Have the Budget) ... Celonis | $60K–$100K/year + $40K–$80K implementation | Case-volume pricing adds up fast; opaque enterprise sales” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“What I would avoid on a limited budget: Celonis, IBM Process Mining, and similar enterprise suites” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“avoid enterprise-first tools like Celonis, which are often described as more expensive” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“The undisputed heavyweight market leader... If you have a highly complex, multi-vendor IT architecture and a large budget... Choose Celonis.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Celonis — The Market Leader ... Key Differentiator: Deep execution management with AI-powered recommendations and the broadest ecosystem” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Celonis remains the undisputed heavyweight, commanding a 31.2% market share through its sophisticated Execution Management System (EMS)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about PM4Py
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“No graphical user interface – Requires programming knowledge and development skills” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Open Source Tools (Avoid if You Don't Have Developers)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Open-source libraries such as PM4Py, if you expect a turnkey business app... a library may leave you responsible for building the interface” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best low-budget starting point: PM4Py—if your company has someone comfortable with Python and data preparation.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have technical/data science resources, PM4Py offers the most power and flexibility at zero cost.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · alternative
“PM4Py is the leading open-source library for process mining in Python. It is completely free” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
Apromore vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromore vs PM4PyMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs PM4PyIBM Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformIBM Process Mining vs PM4PyUiPath Process Mining vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformUiPath Process Mining vs PM4PyMicrosoft Power Automate vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate vs PM4PySAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformSAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs PM4PyAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full process mining standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.