Index › Network and edge › September 2026 Edition

Zero trust network access

Asked as “ZTNA solution”, and as “zero trust remote access tool to replace a VPN”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 40 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.

Standing

Cloudflare One

Contested

35% of first choices, contested.

ShowinginAll 67 categories in the September 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

Small business

Cloudflare One51%Clear leaderStanding →Mid-market

Cloudflare One35%ContestedThis page Enterprise

Zscaler Private Access50%Clear leaderStanding →

01The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.

ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant

Cloudflare One0%29endorsed leader

Twingate0%44accepted challenger

Cato Networks0%16accepted challenger

OpenVPN CloudConnexa0%11accepted challenger

NordLayer6%17accepted challenger

Check Point Harmony SASE27%30criticized challenger

Zscaler62%16criticized challenger

Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate

Netskope47%15criticized challenger

Zscaler Private Access21%29accepted challenger

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access12%16accepted challenger

Tailscale11%19accepted challenger

Cloudflare Access0%14accepted challenger

Netskope Private Access0%10accepted challenger

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its vendor page.

Head to head

Cloudflare One vs Twingate Cloudflare One vs Cato Networks Twingate vs Cato Networks

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default

Negative label rate →

Accepted challengerEndorsed leader

0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%

Key

Cloudflare One35%

Twingate28%

Cato Networks12%

OpenVPN CloudConnexa10%

NordLayer2%

Check Point Harmony SASE2%

Zscaler2%

Zscaler Private Access0%

Tailscale0%

Cloudflare Access0%

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access0%

Netskope Private Access0%

Netskope0%

02What they warned about

Two of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.

Zscaler

62%

10 of 16 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 2 hard negative

“CVE-2025-54982 - SAML authentication bypass; failed to validate SAML assertion signatures | Complete authentication bypass” Kimi K2, negative prompt

Netskope

47%

7 of 15 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 1 hard negative

“Cross-tenant vulnerabilities with leaked enrollment tokens | Attackers could compromise ANY organization” Kimi K2, negative prompt

Check Point Harmony SASE

27%

8 of 30 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 1 hard negative

“(Perimeter 81/Harmony SASE) | Hard-coded encryption keys in diagnostic logs | Customer data exposure” Kimi K2, negative prompt

Zscaler Private Access

21%

6 of 29 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 1 hard negative

“they are generally not recommended for mid-sized B2B companies” Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt

03What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: twelve of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

68 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 6 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 851 links across 212 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

cybersecuritynews.com

36 answers · 38 citations · 10 models

petronellatech.com

26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models

portnox.com

vendor site · Portnox25 answers · 30 citations · 9 models

cyberpress.org

24 answers · 30 citations · 10 models

expertinsights.com

vendor site · Expert Insights24 answers · 24 citations · 10 models

aimultiple.com

22 answers · 23 citations · 10 models

startwithidentity.com

15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models

akamai.com

vendor site · Akamai14 answers · 14 citations · 6 models

zendikt.com

11 answers · 12 citations · 6 models

blog.openvpn.net

vendor site · OpenVPN11 answers · 11 citations · 7 models

cipherssecurity.com

10 answers · 11 citations · 9 models

devopsschool.com

10 answers · 10 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

cybersecuritynews.com/best-ztna-solutions

35 answers · 10 models

petronellatech.com/blog/zero-trust-vendors-compared-top-10-smbs-2026

26 answers · 10 models

expertinsights.com/network-security/the-top-zero-trust-network-access-solut…

23 answers · 10 models

aimultiple.com/ztna-solutions

22 answers · 10 models

cyberpress.org/ztna-solutions-by-business-size

15 answers · 9 models

portnox.com/cybersecurity-101/zero-trust/who-are-the-best-ztna-providers

15 answers · 7 models

akamai.com/site/en/documents/analyst-report/2024/kuppingercole-ztna-analyst…

14 answers · 6 models

startwithidentity.com/articles/top-8-zero-trust-network-access-tools

13 answers · 7 models

zendikt.com/category/ztna-software

11 answers · 6 models

cipherssecurity.com/best-ztna-platforms-2026

10 answers · 9 models

04How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.

ModelDirect“What is the best ZTNA solution for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which zero trust remote access tool to replace a VPN would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top ZTNA solutions and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best ZTNA solution for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a ZTNA solution. What should we look at?”Negative“Which ZTNA solutions should I avoid or be cautious about?”

Claude Haiku 4.5Cloudflare One, Twingate

Three alternatives

Cato Networks, NordLayer, Zscaler Private Access

ZscalerChanged

Two alternatives

Cloudflare One, Twingate

Cloudflare One, Zscaler Private Access

Two alternatives

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Tailscale

Cloudflare One

Four alternatives

Appgate SDP, NordLayer, Tailscale, Twingate

no first choiceagainst: Check Point Harmony SASE, Netskope, Zscaler

GPT-5.4 miniCloudflare One

Two alternatives

Microsoft Entra Private Access, Zscaler Private Access

Cloudflare Access / Cloudflare OneChanged

One alternative

Zscaler Private Access

Three alternatives

Cloudflare Access, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access

Cloudflare Zero Trust / Cloudflare Access

One alternative

Twingate

against: Zscaler Private Accessno first choicenothing named

Gemini 3.5 FlashTwingate

Four alternatives

Cato Networks, Check Point Harmony SASE, Cloudflare Zero Trust / Cloudflare Access, Microsoft Entra Private Access

against: Palo Alto Networks, ZscalerTwingateHeld

Three alternatives

Check Point Harmony SASE, Cloudflare One / Cloudflare Access, Tailscale

against: Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private AccessZscaler Private Access

Four alternatives

Cloudflare One, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks

Cloudflare One

Four alternatives

NetBird, Pomerium, Tailscale, Twingate

no first choice

Five alternatives

Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Tailscale, Twingate, Zscaler

against: Check Point Harmony SASE, Netskope, Zscaler

Perplexity SonarCloudflare Access / Cloudflare One

Four alternatives

Cato Networks, Cisco Duo / Secure Access, Twingate, Zscaler Private Access

Cloudflare OneChanged

Four alternatives

Cato Networks, NordLayer, Twingate, Zscaler

no first choiceCloudflare One

Three alternatives

Check Point Harmony SASE, Microsoft Entra + Intune, Twingate

no first choicenothing named

Grok 4.1 FastCato Networks

Four alternatives

Check Point Harmony SASE, Cloudflare One, Twingate, Zscaler Private Access

Cloudflare OneChanged

Three alternatives

Check Point Harmony SASE, Tailscale, Twingate

against: Zscaler Private AccessZscaler Private Access

Five alternatives

Cloudflare Access, Fortinet Universal ZTNA, Netskope Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Twingate

Cloudflare One

Two alternatives

Tailscale, Twingate

against: NordLayer, Palo Alto, Zscalerno first choice

Two alternatives

Check Point Harmony SASE, Twingate

against: Check Point Harmony SASE, Cisco, Netskope, Zscaler

Mistral SmallCato Networks

Three alternatives

Netskope, NordLayer, Twingate

NordLayer, OpenVPN CloudConnexaChanged

Two alternatives

Check Point Harmony SASE, OpenVPN

Zscaler Private Access

Eight alternatives

Akamai Enterprise Application Access, Appgate SDP, Check Point Harmony SASE, Cloudflare Access, Fortinet FortiNAC, Netskope Private Access, Okta Access Gateway, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access

OpenVPN CloudConnexa, Twingate

One alternative

Tailscale

no first choicenothing named

DeepSeek V4 FlashCato Networks

Two alternatives

Check Point Harmony SASE, Twingate

against: Zscaler Private AccessTwingateChanged

Two alternatives

Cloudflare One, Tailscale

against: Check Point Harmony SASEZscaler Private Access

Eight alternatives

Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare One, Netskope Private Access, NordLayer, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Tailscale, Teleport, Twingate

Cloudflare One

Three alternatives

Microsoft Entra ID + Intune, Tailscale, Twingate

no first choiceagainst: Check Point Harmony SASE, Defined.net / Nebula-based solutions, Netskope, Tailscale, Zscaler

Llama 4 MaverickOpenVPN CloudConnexa

Four alternatives

Cato Networks, Microsoft Entra ID, NordLayer, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange

Check Point Harmony SASEChanged

Four alternatives

Cloudflare Access, NordLayer, OpenVPN CloudConnexa, Twingate

no first choiceCloudflare One

One alternative

Cisco Duo

no first choicenothing named

Qwen 3.7 FlashTwingate

Two alternatives

Cato Networks, Cloudflare One

TwingateHeld

Two alternatives

Cloudflare Access, Tailscale

Zscaler Private Access

Six alternatives

Appgate SDP, Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare Access, Fortinet FortiClient / FortiNAC, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Twingate

Cloudflare One

Three alternatives

Check Point Harmony SASE, Tailscale, Twingate

against: Palo Alto, Zscalerno first choice

One alternative

Tunic/Secure Link

against: Ciscoagainst: Fortinet, Netskope, Palo Alto Networks, Tailscale, Zscaler

Kimi K2Cato Networks

Four alternatives

Check Point Harmony SASE, Cloudflare One, OpenVPN CloudConnexa, Twingate

TwingateChanged

One alternative

Cloudflare Access

Cloudflare Access / Cloudflare One, Twingate

Five alternatives

Appgate SDP, Cisco Duo, Cisco Secure Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Zscaler Private Access

Cloudflare One

Two alternatives

Tailscale, Twingate

no first choice

Four alternatives

Axis Security, Banyan Security, GoodAccess, Twingate

against: Check Point Harmony SASE, Cisco, Fortinetagainst: Check Point Harmony SASE, Fortinet, Netskope, Zscaler

GLM 4.7 FlashXCato Networks

Four alternatives

Check Point Harmony SASE, Cloudflare One, OpenVPN CloudConnexa, Twingate

Cloudflare One, TwingateChanged

Three alternatives

Check Point Harmony SASE, OpenVPN CloudConnexa, Zscaler Private Access

Zscaler Private Access

Six alternatives

Cato Networks, Cloudflare Access, NordLayer, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Twingate, Zero Networks

OpenVPN CloudConnexa, Twingate

Nine alternatives

Cloudflare Access, Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) Conditional Access, Microsoft Intune, NetBird, NordLayer, Octelium, OpenZiti, Pomerium, Tailscale

against: Zscaler Private Accessno first choiceagainst: Fortinet FortiClient EMS, Zscaler Private Access

MiniMax M2.5no first choiceagainst: Akamai – Enterprise Threat Protection (ETP) + Edge DNS, Cisco – Duo + Cisco ISE, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessTwingateChanged

Two alternatives

Cato Networks, Check Point Harmony SASE

Zscaler Private Access

Five alternatives

Appgate SDP, Cloudflare Access, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Twingate

Cloudflare One

Two alternatives

NordLayer, Twingate

no first choiceagainst: Check Point Harmony SASE, Netskope, Zscaler

Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

05The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record

Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.

Prompt	Model	Version string	Time (UTC)	Searched	Sources	Latency
Direct recommendation	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 08:36	yes	13	10 s
Direct recommendation	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 08:28	yes	4	7 s
Direct recommendation	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 09:04	yes	18	29 s
Direct recommendation	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 08:36	yes	20	8 s
Direct recommendation	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 08:42	yes	30	23 s
Direct recommendation	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 09:09	yes	5	5 s
Direct recommendation	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 08:33	yes	8	12 s
Direct recommendation	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 08:35	yes	5	4 s
Direct recommendation	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 09:10	yes	5	34 s
Direct recommendation	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 09:04	yes	7	19 s
Direct recommendation	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 08:55	yes	13	130 s
Direct recommendation	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 08:47	no	0	70 s
Paraphrase	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 08:49	yes	18	9 s
Paraphrase	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 08:59	yes	2	7 s
Paraphrase	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 08:56	yes	9	21 s
Paraphrase	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 08:53	yes	20	6 s
Paraphrase	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 08:55	yes	34	16 s
Paraphrase	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 08:16	yes	5	7 s
Paraphrase	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 08:50	yes	18	22 s
Paraphrase	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 08:40	yes	5	3 s
Paraphrase	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 08:59	yes	5	34 s
Paraphrase	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 08:37	yes	20	33 s
Paraphrase	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 08:23	yes	11	71 s
Paraphrase	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 08:40	yes	5	37 s
Comparative	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 08:21	yes	27	14 s
Comparative	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 08:20	yes	6	9 s
Comparative	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 08:21	yes	22	29 s
Comparative	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 08:32	yes	19	9 s
Comparative	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 08:28	yes	35	16 s
Comparative	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 08:30	yes	18	18 s
Comparative	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 09:11	yes	19	20 s
Comparative	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 09:03	yes	5	3 s
Comparative	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 08:30	yes	5	22 s
Comparative	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 09:03	yes	15	36 s
Comparative	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 09:06	yes	10	82 s
Comparative	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 08:42	yes	14	37 s
Budget constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 08:50	yes	15	11 s
Budget constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 08:52	yes	5	6 s
Budget constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 08:20	yes	19	24 s
Budget constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 08:47	yes	20	5 s
Budget constrained	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 08:27	yes	33	14 s
Budget constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 08:42	yes	5	5 s
Budget constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 08:28	yes	8	12 s
Budget constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 08:23	yes	5	3 s
Budget constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 08:31	yes	5	33 s
Budget constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 09:05	yes	14	47 s
Budget constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 08:28	yes	14	76 s
Budget constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 08:41	yes	5	26 s
Scale constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 08:24	yes	18	14 s
Scale constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 09:11	no	0	7 s
Scale constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 08:24	yes	12	26 s
Scale constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 08:22	yes	20	8 s
Scale constrained	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 08:37	yes	20	11 s
Scale constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 08:27	no	0	11 s
Scale constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 09:11	yes	10	20 s
Scale constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 09:04	yes	5	3 s
Scale constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 09:13	no	0	46 s
Scale constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 08:41	yes	10	61 s
Scale constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 08:54	yes	30	85 s
Scale constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 08:23	yes	5	20 s
Negative framing	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-17 09:10	yes	17	9 s
Negative framing	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-17 08:45	yes	5	6 s
Negative framing	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-17 08:24	yes	18	25 s
Negative framing	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-17 09:08	yes	20	7 s
Negative framing	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-17 09:07	yes	35	16 s
Negative framing	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-17 08:17	yes	5	6 s
Negative framing	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-17 08:37	yes	29	29 s
Negative framing	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-17 08:35	yes	5	3 s
Negative framing	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-17 09:14	yes	27	149 s
Negative framing	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-17 08:29	yes	15	25 s
Negative framing	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-17 08:56	yes	15	43 s
Negative framing	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-17 09:02	yes	5	18 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

Category-scoped readings

Check Point read as Check Point Harmony SASE

Check Point (Harmony SASE/Perimeter 81) read as Check Point Harmony SASE

Check Point Harmony read as Check Point Harmony SASE

Microsoft Entra read as Microsoft Entra ID

Unresolved, counted raw

Absolute Secure Access

Akamai – Enterprise Threat Protection (ETP) + Edge DNS

Axis Security

Check Point Quantum/Harmony SASE

Cisco Duo / Secure Access

Cisco – Duo + Cisco ISE (Zero Trust)

Cyolo

Defined.net / Nebula-based solutions

Firezone

Fortinet FortiClient EMS

Fortinet FortiNAC

Fortinet ZTNA/FortiGate/FortiClient

Ivanti ZTNA

Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) Conditional Access

Microsoft – Azure AD Conditional Access + Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps

NetFoundry

Octelium

Tunic/Secure Link

Discontinued, still offered

No shut-down product was recommended here.

Zero trust network access

By buyer segment

01The standing

Recommended versus criticized

02What they warned about

03What they cite

Sites the answers cite

Pages the answers cite

04How they answered

05The record

Normalization in this category

Also in network and edge