Data virtualization for enterprise buyers
Asked as “data virtualization platform”, and as “data fabric for federated queries”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 43 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
86%
Clear leader
86Denodo05TIBCO Data Virtualization02CData Virtuality07others
86% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Denodo vs DremioDenodo vs CData VirtualityDenodo vs TIBCO Data VirtualizationTrino vs Starburst GalaxyTrino vs StarburstTrino vs DremioTrino vs CData VirtualityTrino vs TIBCO Data VirtualizationStarburst Galaxy vs StarburstStarburst Galaxy vs DremioStarburst Galaxy vs CData VirtualityStarburst Galaxy vs TIBCO Data VirtualizationStarburst vs DremioStarburst vs CData VirtualityStarburst vs TIBCO Data VirtualizationDremio vs CData VirtualityDremio vs TIBCO Data VirtualizationCData Virtuality vs TIBCO Data Virtualization
One product takes 86% of first choices here, so the chart would put seven markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. One product carries a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Thirteen of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Qwen 3.7 Flash changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
TIBCO Data Virtualization23%
9 of 39 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“TIBCO Data Virtualization (in its current form)... Complex to set up and configure; requires specialized skills” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Denodo8%
6 of 72 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“While **Denodo** is a leader, its competitors (like older versions of generic web services) that haven't adapted to Iceberg/Open Table formats are falling behind.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Dremio14%
4 of 28 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid platforms that rely heavily on **Per-User** or **Pay-as-you-go Compute Credits** (common in some cloud-native lakehouse tools like early-stage versions of Dremio or Starburst Galaxy” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Apache Drill
100%
3 of 3 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Apache Drill** without enterprise hardening): Lack enterprise-grade governance, caching, security” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1166 links across 282 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · Domo43 answers · 44 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Promethium37 answers · 51 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Denodo31 answers · 60 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Airbyte27 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G223 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Gitnux18 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
41 answers · 12 models
32 answers · 12 models
27 answers · 11 models
25 answers · 12 models
23 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best data virtualization platform”, “data virtualization platform”, “data virtualization platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denodo denodo.com | 86% | 194 | 2,400 | 109 | 13,422 | 35 | 1 | |
| TIBCO Data Virtualization tibco.com | 5% | 93 | 70 | 3 | 48,161 | |||
| Dremio dremio.com | 2% | 87 | 2,900 | 99 | 55,606 | 0 | 8 | |
| IBM parent site IBM Data Virtualization 2%, IBM Cloud Pak for Data 0%, IBM Cloud Pak for Data / IBM Data Virtualization 0%, IBM watsonx.data 0% and 1 more | 2% | 40 | 201,000 | 34,098 | ||||
| CData Virtuality cdata.com CData Virtuality 2%, CData Connect Cloud 0% | 2% | 30 | 70 | 4 | 19,412 | 120 | ||
| Starburst starburst.io Starburst Galaxy 2%, Starburst 0% | 2% | 73 | 74,000 | 12,470 | 6,703 | 25 | ||
| Informatica PowerCenter informatica.com Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud 0%, Informatica PowerCenter 0% | 0% | 259 | 720 | 98 | 73,321 | 120 | ||
| AtScale atscale.com | 0% | 13 | 1,600 | 23 | 14,764 | $619 | 5 | 9 |
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Fabric 0% | 0% | 27 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization redhat.com | 0% | 21 | 10 | 0 | 1,347,338 | $281 | 117 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 19 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (denodo.com, domo.com, promethium.ai, thectoclub.com). The first result for “best data virtualization platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best data virtualization platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which data fabric for federated queries would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade data virtualization platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best data virtualization platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a data virtualization platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which data virtualization platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5DenodoDenodoHeldDenodoDenodo, TIBCO Data Virtualizationno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, TIBCO Data VirtualizationThree alternatives
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Fabric, StarburstSix alternatives
AtScale, Dremio, Informatica Data Virtualization, Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualizationTwo alternatives
Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization, StarburstGPT-5.4 miniDenodoDenodoHeldDenodoDenodoagainst: SAP Datasphereno first choiceagainst: IBM, K2view, Microsoft, Salesforce Connect
Two alternatives
IBM Data Virtualization / Cloud Pak for Data, SAP DatasphereTwo alternatives
Databricks Lakehouse Federation, StarburstFive alternatives
AtScale, IBM Cloud Pak for Data / IBM Data Virtualization, Starburst, Starburst Galaxy, TIBCO Data VirtualizationOne alternative
TIBCO Data VirtualizationGemini 3.5 FlashDenodoDenodoHeldDenodoDenodoagainst: Dremio, Starburstno first choiceagainst: Apache Drill, IBM Cloud Pak for Data, IBM InfoSphere Federation Server, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft PolyBase, Oracle Database Gateway, Presto, Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization, SAP Datasphere, Spotfire Data Virtualization, Trino
Four alternatives
Dremio, SAP Datasphere, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualizationThree alternatives
Dremio, Microsoft Fabric, StarburstFive alternatives
Dremio, IBM Cloud Pak for Data / Watson Query, SAP Datasphere, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualizationOne alternative
Spotfire Data VirtualizationPerplexity SonarDenodoDenodoHeldDenodoDenodono first choiceagainst: Apache Drill, Presto, Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Data Virtualization, Trino
One alternative
IBM Data VirtualizationTwo alternatives
Microsoft Fabric, SAP DatasphereSix alternatives
IBM Cloud Pak for Data, IBM Data Virtualization, Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization, SAP HANA, SAS Federation Server, TIBCO Data VirtualizationGrok 4.1 FastDenodoDenodoHeldDenodoDenodoagainst: Dremio, Starburst GalaxyDenodoagainst: Apache Drill, Cisco, Composite Information Server, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Presto, SAP HANA, Starburst Galaxy, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Two alternatives
IBM Data Fabric / watsonx.data, TIBCO Data VirtualizationThree alternatives
IBM Cloud Pak for Data, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, StarburstFive alternatives
AtScale, IBM watsonx.data, Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualizationTwo alternatives
IBM watsonx.data, TIBCO DataVirtOne alternative
IBM Data VirtualizationMistral SmallDenodoDenodoHeldDenodoDenodoagainst: AWS, Agorano first choiceagainst: Denodo, IBM Cloud Pak for Data, SAP HANA Smart Data Access, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Two alternatives
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, SAP DatasphereTwo alternatives
Dremio, Microsoft FabricSix alternatives
Dremio, IBM Cloud Pak for Data / IBM Data Virtualization, Informatica PowerCenter, SAP HANA, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualizationDeepSeek V4 FlashDenodoagainst: AWS GlueDenodoHeldDenodoagainst: DremioDenodoagainst: Starburst Galaxy, TIBCO Data VirtualizationDenodoagainst: Denodo, Domo, IBM Cloud Pak for Data, SAP HANA, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Four alternatives
CData Connect Cloud, IBM Cloud Pak for Data, Informatica Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data VirtualizationTwo alternatives
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, StarburstFive alternatives
AtScale, IBM Data Virtualization, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualizationOne alternative
DremioFive alternatives
Dremio, IBM Data Virtualization, Red Hat, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualizationLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashDenodoDremioChangedDenodoCData Virtualityagainst: Dremio, Starburst GalaxyDenodoagainst: Accelario, Apache Teiid, Denodo, Oracle Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data Virtualization, Trino
Four alternatives
Dremio, Microsoft Fabric / Synapse, Rockset, StarburstThree alternatives
Denodo, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, StarburstFour alternatives
Actian Zappy, Dremio, Starburst, TalendOne alternative
DenodoThree alternatives
Microsoft Fabric, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualityKimi K2DenodoDenodoHeldDenodoTIBCO Data Virtualizationno first choiceagainst: Denodo, IBM, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Three alternatives
CData Virtuality, IBM Cloud Pak for Data, StarburstTwo alternatives
IBM Cloud Pak for Data, Starburst GalaxyFour alternatives
Data Virtuality, IBM Cloud Pak for Data, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualizationTwo alternatives
Denodo, Informatica PowerCenter / IDMCGLM 4.7 FlashXDenodoDenodoHeldagainst: Microsoft FabricDenodoStarburst Galaxyno first choiceagainst: Databricks, Domo, IBM Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data Virtualization, Teiid
Three alternatives
IBM Data Virtualization, K2View Fabric, Starburst GalaxyOne alternative
StarburstFive alternatives
IBM Cloud Pak for Data, Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization, SAP HANA, Starburst Galaxy, TIBCO Data VirtualizationTwo alternatives
Denodo, DremioMiniMax M2.5DenodoDenodoHeldDenodono first choiceno first choiceagainst: Denodo
Three alternatives
IBM InfoSphere Data Virtualization, Oracle Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data VirtualizationFour alternatives
IBM Data Fabric, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Fabric, StarburstFour alternatives
AtScale, IBM InfoSphere Federation Server / IBM Cloud Pak for Data, Informatica Data Virtualization, Red Hat JBoss Data VirtualizationGPT-6 LunaDenodoDenodoHeldDenodo, IBM Data Virtualizationagainst: SAP HANA Smart Data AccessIBM Data Virtualizationno first choiceagainst: IBM Data Virtualization Manager for z/OS, IBM Data Virtualization as a Service, Spotfire Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Three alternatives
Dremio, SAP Datasphere, StarburstTwo alternatives
Dremio, StarburstFour alternatives
CData Virtuality, Dremio, Starburst, TIBCO Data VirtualizationOne alternative
DenodoMuse Glimmer 30BDenodoDenodoHeldDenodoDenodoDenodoagainst: Actian DataConnect, Denodo, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Four alternatives
CData, Data Virtuality, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, TIBCO Data VirtualizationTwo alternatives
Dremio, StarburstFour alternatives
CData Virtuality, Data Virtuality, IBM Data Virtualization, TIBCO Data VirtualizationOne alternative
TIBCO Data VirtualizationThree alternatives
Dremio, Starburst, TrinoBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:03 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:30 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:48 | yes | 14 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:52 | yes | 25 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:53 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:02 | yes | 17 | 55 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:17 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:13 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:47 | yes | 21 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:40 | yes | 18 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:18 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:39 | yes | 4 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:11 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:57 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:12 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:22 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:28 | yes | 16 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:14 | yes | 22 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:53 | yes | 8 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:35 | yes | 23 | 50 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:05 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:57 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:54 | yes | 25 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:48 | yes | 23 | 45 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:14 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:57 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:55 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:06 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:04 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 22 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:54 | yes | 16 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:14 | yes | 23 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:41 | yes | 7 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:37 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:08 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:42 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 21 | 48 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:43 | yes | 22 | 58 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:13 | yes | 7 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:45 | yes | 23 | 47 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:02 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:19 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:11 | yes | 18 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:06 | yes | 16 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:07 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:25 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:22 | yes | 23 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:39 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:42 | yes | 21 | 62 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:45 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:58 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:24 | yes | 20 | 56 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:39 | yes | 2 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:32 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:19 | yes | 1 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:38 | yes | 4 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:48 | yes | 25 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:27 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:40 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:09 | yes | 20 | 59 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:47 | yes | 21 | 51 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:33 | yes | 24 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:50 | yes | 21 | 55 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:17 | no | 0 | 52 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:59 | yes | 3 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:52 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:46 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:41 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:44 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:04 | yes | 16 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:13 | yes | 22 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:14 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:34 | yes | 25 | 64 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:10 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:44 | yes | 9 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:37 | yes | 23 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:51 | yes | 22 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:28 | yes | 15 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:17 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:05 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Informatica read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Informatica (CDG) read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Informatica (Data Integration & Virtualization) read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Oracle read as Oracle Data Virtualization
TIBCO read as TIBCO Data Virtualization
TIBCO Data Virtualization, TDV read as TIBCO Data Virtualization
Tibco read as TIBCO Data Virtualization
Unresolved, counted raw
Actian DataConnect
Actian Zappy
Composite Information Server
Dremio
Dremio/Starburst
IBM Data Fabric
IBM Data Fabric / watsonx.data
IBM Data Virtualization Manager for z/OS
IBM Data Virtualization as a Service (DVaaS)
IBM InfoSphere Data Virtualization
IBM InfoSphere Federation Server
IBM InfoSphere Federation Server / IBM Cloud Pak for Data (CPD)
IBM's Watson Query
JBoss Data Virtualization
Microsoft PolyBase
Oracle Database Gateway
Promethium AI-Native Data Fabric
QueryGrid
Rockset
Salesforce Connect
TIBCO Data Virtuality
TIBCO DataVirt
Teradata Data Fabric
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.