| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data virtualization | Data platform | 0% | 16 of 99 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Denodo at 28% | |
| ML platforms | Data platform | 0% | 71 of 107 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Azure Machine Learning at 21% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If your company is already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem, Microsoft Fabric is a compelling option.” Mistral Small · Data virtualization · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“2. Microsoft Fabric — Choose if you are already fully invested in the Microsoft stack” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Data virtualization · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for enterprises focused on Microsoft's ecosystem and analytics.” Mistral Small · Data virtualization · comparative prompt · alternative
“If You're Heavy Microsoft Ecosystem: Microsoft Fabric” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Data virtualization · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 28 answers that named Microsoft Fabric and are not a share of its labels.
Eighty-seven of the eighty-seven domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Fabric came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Microsoft Fabric's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-fabric. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Fabric's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Fabric, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Fabric by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: