AI Indexes
IT AI Index
September 2026 Edition, published September 17, 2026 · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › Cloud and infrastructure › Object storage › Enterprise › September 2026 Edition

Object storage for enterprise buyers

Asked as “object storage service”, and as “S3-compatible cloud storage”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
44%
Clear leader
44Amazon S323Wasabi Object Storage08Cloudflare R225others

44% of first choices, clear leader.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Amazon S344%25%63criticized default
02Wasabi Object Storage23%20%44accepted challenger
03Cloudflare R28%14%28accepted challenger
04Azure Blob Storage6%24%50accepted challenger
05Google Cloud Storage Lab in the set4%23%48accepted challenger
06Backblaze B22%18%40accepted challenger
07Cloudian HyperStore2%4%24accepted challenger
08NetApp StorageGRID2%0%12accepted challenger
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09MinIO AIStor0%10%31accepted challenger
10IBM Cloud Object Storage0%6%18accepted challenger
11Scality RING0%0%13accepted challenger
12Dell ObjectScale0%0%11accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Cloud Storage is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other eleven models two times of 44. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Amazon S344%
02Wasabi Object Storage23%
03Cloudflare R28%
04Azure Blob Storage6%
05Google Cloud Storage4%
06Backblaze B22%
07Cloudian HyperStore2%
08NetApp StorageGRID2%
09MinIO AIStor0%
10IBM Cloud Object Storage0%
11Scality RING0%
12Dell ObjectScale0%

What they warned about

Seven of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Amazon S3
25%
16 of 63 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Google Cloud Storage, Amazon S3, and Azure Blob Storage are some of the services that have been labeled as "negative" or "avoid"” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Azure Blob Storage
24%
12 of 50 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“labeled as "negative" or "avoid" by various AI models. The reasons for this include high egress fees, minimum retention periods, and unpredictable bills.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Google Cloud Storage
23%
11 of 48 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Google Cloud Storage, Amazon S3, and Azure Blob Storage are some of the services that have been labeled as "negative" or "avoid"” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Wasabi Object Storage
20%
9 of 44 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Confusing billing, UI complexity, support concerns, and explicitly noted as "not ideal for large enterprises"{}” Kimi K2, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1009 links across 254 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

vendor site · Cloudian42 answers · 81 citations · 12 models
vendor site · DigitalOcean41 answers · 49 citations · 12 models
24 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Scality23 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Backblaze21 answers · 37 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Internxt17 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Impossible Cloud17 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Amazon16 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Atlantic.Net16 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G215 answers · 19 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best object storage service”, “object storage service”, “object storage services”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Amazon parent site
Amazon S3 44%
44%191151,000,0001,380,939
Wasabi Object Storage wasabi.com23%14270113,52676
Cloudflare parent site
Cloudflare R2 8%
8%131550,00010,897
Azure parent site
Azure Blob Storage 6%
6%110301,00047,904
Google Cloud cloud.google.com
Google Cloud Storage 4%
4%119165,0007,5967,405,3474
Internxt internxt.com
Internxt S3 4%, Internxt 0%
4%3
Backblaze backblaze.com
Backblaze B2 2%
2%17127,100818135,980 company747
Cloudian HyperStore cloudian.com2%3590051,205108
NetApp StorageGRID netapp.com2%153209137,356$1793
Amazon Simple Storage Service S32%

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (aws.amazon.com, backblaze.com, cloudian.com). The first result for “best object storage service” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best object storage service for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which S3-compatible cloud storage would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade object storage services and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best object storage service for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an object storage service. What should we look at?”Negative“Which object storage services should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Amazon S3
Two alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage
Amazon S3Held
Four alternativesBackblaze B2, DigitalOcean Spaces, MinIO AIStor, Wasabi Object Storage
no first choiceWasabi Object Storage
Two alternativesCloudflare R2, IBM Cloud Object Storage
against: Amazon S3
no first choiceagainst: Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, MinIO AIStor
GPT-5.4 miniAmazon S3
Two alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage
Amazon S3Held
One alternativeBackblaze B2
Amazon S3
Four alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, IBM Cloud Object Storage, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage
Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storageagainst: Amazon S3no first choice
Three alternativesAmazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage
nothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashCloudflare R2
Five alternativesAmazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, MinIO AIStor, Wasabi Object Storage
Cloudflare R2Held
Four alternativesAmazon S3, Backblaze B2, MinIO AIStor, Wasabi Object Storage
Amazon S3
Seven alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Backblaze B2, Cloudflare R2, Cloudian HyperStore, Google Cloud Storage, MinIO AIStor, Wasabi Object Storage
Cloudflare R2, Wasabi Object Storage
One alternativeBackblaze B2
against: Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage
Amazon S3
Four alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Cloudflare R2, Google Cloud Storage, MinIO AIStor
against: Backblaze B2, Wasabi Object Storage
against: Backblaze B2, Ceph, GlusterFS, IDrive e2, MinIO AIStor, Wasabi Object Storage
Perplexity SonarAmazon S3
Six alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Backblaze B2, Ceph, Cloudian HyperStore, Dell ObjectScale, Google Cloud Storage
Amazon S3, Wasabi Object StorageChanged
Two alternativesBackblaze B2, Cloudflare R2
no first choiceWasabi Object Storage
Three alternativesBackblaze B2, Internxt S3, MEGA S4
no first choiceagainst: Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage
Grok 4.20Amazon S3
Two alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage
Amazon S3Held
Two alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage
against: Backblaze B2, Cloudflare R2, DigitalOcean Spaces, Wasabi Object Storage
no first choiceWasabi Object Storage
One alternativeBackblaze B2
against: Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Cloudian HyperStore, Google Cloud Storage, IBM Cloud Object Storage
no first choice
Three alternativesAmazon S3, Backblaze B2, Cloudflare R2
against: Backblaze B2, DigitalOcean Spaces, Storj, Wasabi Object Storage
Mistral SmallAzure Blob Storage
Three alternativesCloudian HyperStore, Google Cloud Storage, IBM Cloud Object Storage
Cloudian HyperStoreChanged
Two alternativesBackblaze B2, Google Cloud Storage
Amazon S3
Nine alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Cloudian HyperStore, Google Cloud Storage, Hitachi Content Platform, IBM Cloud Object Storage, MinIO AIStor, NetApp StorageGRID, Quantum ActiveScale, Scality RING
Wasabi Object Storage
One alternativeInternxt
against: Amazon S3
no first choiceagainst: Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, Wasabi Object Storage
DeepSeek V4 FlashAmazon S3
Three alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Cloudflare R2, Google Cloud Storage
Amazon S3Held
Three alternativesBackblaze B2, Cloudian HyperStore, Wasabi Object Storage
Amazon S3
Six alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, IBM Cloud Object Storage, MinIO AIStor, NetApp StorageGRID, Scality RING
Cloudflare R2
One alternativeWasabi Object Storage
against: Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage
no first choiceagainst: Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Backblaze B2, Cloudflare R2, Google Cloud Storage, Wasabi Object Storage
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceBackblaze B2Changed
Four alternativesCloudian HyperStore, DigitalOcean Spaces, MinIO AIStor, Wasabi Object Storage
no first choiceInternxt S3
Two alternativesBackblaze B2, Wasabi Object Storage
no first choiceagainst: Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, Wasabi Object Storage
Qwen 3.7 FlashAmazon S3
Five alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Backblaze B2, MinIO AIStor, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, Wasabi Object Storage
Amazon S3Held
Four alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Backblaze B2, MinIO AIStor, Wasabi Object Storage
Amazon S3
Five alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Backblaze B2, Google Cloud Storage, MinIO AIStor, Wasabi Object Storage
Wasabi Object Storage
Two alternativesBackblaze B2, Cloudflare R2
against: Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, GCP Storage
no first choiceagainst: Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Ceph, Google Cloud Storage, MinIO AIStor, Swift
Kimi K2Amazon S3
Three alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, IBM Cloud Object Storage
Amazon S3Held
Two alternativesCloudflare R2, Wasabi Object Storage
Amazon S3
Nine alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Backblaze B2, Cloudflare R2, Google Cloud Storage, MinIO AIStor, NetApp StorageGRID, Red Hat Ceph Storage, Scality RING, Wasabi Object Storage
Wasabi Object Storage
Three alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Box, Cloudflare R2
Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storageagainst: Backblaze B2, Wasabi Object Storage
GLM 4.7 FlashXAmazon S3
Six alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Backblaze B2, Cloudflare R2, Google Cloud Storage, MinIO AIStor, Wasabi Object Storage
NetApp StorageGRIDChanged
Five alternativesBackblaze B2, Cloudflare R2, Cloudian HyperStore, MinIO AIStor, Scality RING
Amazon S3
Nine alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Backblaze B2, Cloudflare R2, Google Cloud Storage, IDrive e2, MinIO AIStor, OpenStack Swift, Storj, Wasabi Object Storage
against: Ceph
Wasabi Object Storage
Two alternativesCloudian HyperStore, IBM Cloud Object Storage
no first choicenothing named
MiniMax M2.5Amazon S3
Seven alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Backblaze B2, Cloudflare R2, Google Cloud Storage, IBM Cloud Object Storage, MinIO AIStor, Wasabi Object Storage
no first choiceChangedAmazon S3
Four alternativesAzure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, IBM Cloud Object Storage, Oracle Cloud Storage
IBM Cloud Object Storage One-Rate
One alternativeBackblaze B2
against: Amazon S3
no first choiceagainst: Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:53no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:05yes36 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:42yes1227 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:10yes173 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 07:46yes228 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:12yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:06yes1925 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:20yes51 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:49no027 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:50yes1421 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 07:48yes2037 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:44no059 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:50no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:40yes57 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:44yes724 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 12:20yes164 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:31yes2410 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 13:27yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:31yes2424 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 12:48yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:35no033 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:31yes1922 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:29yes22186 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:18no061 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:22yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:34yes610 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:04yes1427 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:35yes196 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:01yes2412 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 13:39yes811 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:46yes2546 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:31yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:22no029 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:38yes2535 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:50yes2085 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:14yes1023 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:50yes189 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:03yes47 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:58yes1128 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:22yes192 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:20yes2412 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:35yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:22yes2318 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 12:05yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:20yes1958 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:56yes2530 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:43yes24144 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:08yes1327 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:00no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:45yes510 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:35no018 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:03yes186 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:13yes198 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:09no010 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:50yes2539 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:45yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:39no032 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:00yes1036 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:31yes1422 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:05yes1522 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:52yes168 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:52yes46 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:31yes2126 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 12:03yes183 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 07:59yes238 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:12yes53 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 07:27yes2360 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:13yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:34yes1039 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:00yes2422 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:56yes24149 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:05yes1143 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS read as Amazon S3
Azure read as Azure Blob Storage
Azure Blob read as Azure Blob Storage
Azure Blob (Hot LRS) read as Azure Blob Storage
Backblaze read as Backblaze B2
Cloudian read as Cloudian HyperStore
Dell ECS read as Dell ObjectScale
Dell ECS (Elastic Cloud Storage) read as Dell ObjectScale
Dell EMC ECS read as Dell ObjectScale
Dell EMC ECS (Elastic Cloud Storage) read as Dell ObjectScale
IBM read as IBM Cloud Object Storage
IBM (Storage Scale) read as IBM Cloud Object Storage
Microsoft Azure read as Azure Blob Storage
MinIO read as MinIO AIStor
MinIO (now AIStor) read as MinIO AIStor
MinIO (self-hosted) read as MinIO AIStor
MinIO (specifically the free/Community Edition) read as MinIO AIStor
Oracle read as Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage
Oracle Cloud read as Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage
Scality read as Scality RING
Wasabi read as Wasabi Object Storage
Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage read as Wasabi Object Storage
Wasabi Technologies read as Wasabi Object Storage
minIO read as MinIO AIStor
Unresolved, counted raw
Amazon Simple Storage Service S3
Azure Blob Archive
Cloud Storage
Dell EMC ECS – Elastic Cloud Storage
Hitachi Content Platform
IBM COS
IBM Cloud Object Storage One-Rate
Microsoft Azure Storage / Azure Blob
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP / Azure NetApp Files
OpenStack Swift
Oracle Cloud Storage
Pure Storage FlashBlade //OBJECT
Quantum ActiveScale
Red Hat Ceph Storage
Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Rook/Ceph
Swift
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Managed KubernetesServer virtualization →