IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Azure Blob Storage · September 2026 Edition
Azure · 2 categories · Ranked

Azure Blob Storage

114Judge labels
4First choices
36Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Object storage for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 46 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 22% of its 46 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In object storage · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Azure Blob Storage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Object storageCloud and infrastructure8%4 of 4622%46accepted challenger
Backup and disaster recoveryCloud and infrastructure0%74 of 1210%1under 10 labels · led by Veeam at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Azure Blob Storage yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Azure Blob Storage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.512104
GPT-5.4 mini02215
Gemini 3.5 Flash00224
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast02204
Mistral Small11114
DeepSeek V4 Flash02125
Llama 4 Maverick00112
Qwen 3.7 Flash03216
Kimi K202114
GLM 4.7 FlashX10203
MiniMax M2.502215

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct23 labels3
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative26 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained14 labels1
Scale-constrained21 labelsNone
Negative28 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative114 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“S3 or Azure Blob Storage are strong defaults because they offer reliability, scalability, mature features, and good enterprise support” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Object storage · direct prompt · first choice
“Backblaze B2 or Microsoft Azure Blob Storage are the best starting points” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Object storage · direct prompt · first choice
“Amazon S3 and Microsoft Azure Blob Storage are the top choices” Mistral Small · Object storage · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Azure Blob Storage if your stack is Microsoft-centric or you want flexible redundancy and access tiers.” GPT-5.4 mini · Object storage · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“~$18/TB/month plus ~$87/TB egress” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Object storage · budget prompt · hard negative
“Azure is the biggest culprit for S3-compatibility issues... If you use third-party tools... to talk to Azure, things often break” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Object storage · negative prompt · soft negative
“S3 compatibility is still in preview and not fully mature ... may not be a stable choice yet” Mistral Small · Object storage · negative prompt · soft negative
“stay with S3, Google Cloud Storage, or Azure Blob — but budget for higher cost.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Object storage · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Azure Blob Storage, over the 111 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Azure Blob Storage was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Amazon S3108 of 11132Not in the top three
Google Cloud Storage107 of 1110Not in the top three
Wasabi71 of 1119Not in the top three
Backblaze B268 of 11120Not in the top three
Cloudflare R260 of 11116Not in the top three
MinIO43 of 1110Not in the top three
DigitalOcean Spaces35 of 1111Not in the top three
IBM Cloud Object Storage25 of 1111Not in the top three
Scality RING14 of 1111Not in the top three
Linode Object Storage14 of 1110Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Azure Blob Storage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 79 of the 111 answers that named Azure Blob Storage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mixpeek.com34
solved.scality.com34
gartner.com30
enterprisestorageforum.com26
digitalocean.com25
cloudexpat.com23
github.com22
solutionsreview.com20
worldmetrics.org20
backblaze.com17

251 of the 251 domain citations in answers naming Azure Blob Storage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Azure Blob Storage

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Azure Blob Storage; a claim can dispute any of them.
Azure Blob 12Microsoft Azure Blob Storage 11Azure 3Azure Archive 1Azure Archive Storage 1Azure Blob Hot 1Azure Blob Storage (Cool/Archive tiers) 1Azure Cold 1Microsoft Azure Blob 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Azure Blob Storage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Azure Blob Storage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at azure.cn is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack