Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 29 of 46
1 category · RankedNetApp StorageGRID
15Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Object storage for enterprise buyers
Rank 31 of 51 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market31 of 51
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise9 of 56
2%12 labels
accepted challenger
In object storage · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named NetApp StorageGRID for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object storage | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 31 of 51 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Backblaze B2 at 46% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, NetApp StorageGRID held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Object storage · by segment
Enterprise▼−5Since September 2026: 8% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 5 → 8 of 46
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object storage | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 31 of 51 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated NetApp StorageGRID across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated NetApp StorageGRID across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as NetApp StorageGRID, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NetApp StorageGRID was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as NetApp StorageGRID, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NetApp StorageGRID was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named NetApp StorageGRID. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named NetApp StorageGRID and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
worldmetrics.org10
cloudian.com9
solved.scality.com9
digitalocean.com7
enterprisestorageforum.com7
storagenewsletter.com7
thectoclub.com6
atlantic.net4
aws.amazon.com4
backblaze.com4
Sixty-seven of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming NetApp StorageGRID came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
netapp.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, NetApp StorageGRID takes 0% of first choices and Backblaze B2 takes 46%.ShowHide
Search and answers
netapp.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, NetApp StorageGRID takes 0% of first choices and Backblaze B2 takes 46%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “object storage service”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “object storage services”
3
- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“netapp storagegrid”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 9 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 137,356 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 16,087 · 1,601 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 19,628
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 24 clicks and $1 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 31 of 51 in object storage
Segment leader
46%
Backblaze B2
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on netapp.com
10,000
subdomains included
Content
637
counted in the table below
Documentation
8,342
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 556 | undated | Object storage, Infra monitoring | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 43 | undated | |||
| Case study | 17 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 11 | 0 | 2022-03-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 3 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2023-03-28 |
Most recent
- 2023-03-28Pressing Resume button returns to upgrade initial screen without error news or press
- 2022-03-01No subject alternative names matching IP address when adding authentication server to AIQUM comparison
- 2020-06-22How to create an alternative user for na root sp login comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page netapp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow NetApp StorageGRID
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
NetApp StorageGRID is its own company.ShowHide
The company
NetApp StorageGRID is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- All-Flash Available
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What NetApp StorageGRID's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: netapp.com, trust.netapp.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NetApp StorageGRID's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NetApp StorageGRID, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for NetApp StorageGRID by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where NetApp StorageGRID is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name NetApp StorageGRID, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.