Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 19 of 34
2 categories · RankedScality RING
19Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Object storage for enterprise buyers
Rank 14 of 51 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business25 of 43
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market14 of 51
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise14 of 56
0%13 labels
accepted challenger
In object storage · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Scality RING for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object storage | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 14 of 51 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Backblaze B2 at 46% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Enterprise storage systems | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 120 of 167 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Dell PowerStore at 16% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Scality RING held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Object storage · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 13 of 46
Enterprise▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 6 → 13 of 46
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object storage | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 14 of 51 |
| Enterprise storage | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 120 of 167, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Scality RING across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Scality RING across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Scality RING, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Scality RING was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Scality RING, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Scality RING was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Scality RING. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 19 answers that named Scality RING and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
solved.scality.comYour site16
worldmetrics.org12
cloudian.com11
digitalocean.com10
g2.com8
gartner.com7
enterprisestorageforum.com6
thectoclub.com6
atlantic.net5
geekflare.com5
Seventy of the eighty-six domain citations in answers naming Scality RING came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
scality.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Scality RING takes 0% of first choices and Backblaze B2 takes 46%.ShowHide
Search and answers
scality.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Scality RING takes 0% of first choices and Backblaze B2 takes 46%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “object storage service”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “object storage services”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“scality ring”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 11,465 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 7,552 · 96 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,527
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 14 of 51 in object storage
Segment leader
46%
Backblaze B2
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 19 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 19 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on scality.com
1,343
subdomains included
Content
881
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
8 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 411 | 72 | 2026-09-18 | Object storage, DLP | |
| News or press | 279 | 4 | 2026-09-09 | Object storage | |
| Glossary or explainer | 79 | undated | Object storage, SIEM | ||
| Case study | 59 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 35 | 9 | 2026-09-20 | Object storage | |
| Report or ebook | 8 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 4 | 1 | 2026-07-27 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | 0 | 2024-07-03 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-20Backup success vs recovery success comparison
- 2026-09-20Cloud vs on prem backup recovery cost comparison
- 2026-09-18Data sovereignty for ai blog
- 2026-09-18Metadata residency blog
- 2026-09-18Data sovereignty procurement blog
- 2026-09-18Sovereign cloud architecture blog
Events in person
Upcoming
- November 3, 2026Journée Scality à ToulouseToulouse, France · hosts
- November 5, 2026Journée Scality à NantesNantes, France · hosts
Last twelve months
- October 8, 2026Scality Day3 Mazarium, Paris, France · hosted
As the event pages on scality.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page scality.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Scality RING
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Scality RING; a claim can dispute any of them.
Scality 2
Follow Scality RING
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Scality RING is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Scality RING is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Scale-out file and object storage for always-on enterprise data.
- For
- Service Provider, Sovereign Cloud Operator
- Integrations claimed
- 150 scality.com/products/ring
- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 27001FIPS 140SOC 2Common CriteriaSecNumCloudSEC 17a-4(f)DORA & NIS2HIPAA
- Customers named
- SeqOIA Médecine GénomiqueOrangeNatixisSI CloudAP-HMÉlectricité de FranceNational Library of ScotlandOman Data Park
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Scality RING's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: scality.com, scality.com/security, scality.com/products/ring, scality.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Scality RING's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Scality RING, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Scality RING by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Scality RING is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Scality RING, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.