IT AI Index
Index › Vendors › Scality RING · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Scality RING

19Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Object storage for enterprise buyers
Rank 21 of 46 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market21 of 46
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise6 of 61
5%17 labels
accepted challenger
In object storage · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Scality RING for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Object storageCloud and infrastructure0%21 of 460%2under 10 labels · led by Backblaze B2 at 46%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Scality RING yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Scality RING across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative11 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Scality RING, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Scality RING was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Amazon S317 of 1910Not in the top three
Google Cloud Storage15 of 191Not in the top three
NetApp StorageGRID15 of 190Not in the top three
Azure Blob Storage14 of 191Not in the top three
Cloudian HyperStore13 of 190Not in the top three
MinIO12 of 190Not in the top three
Cloudflare R210 of 192Not in the top three
Dell ObjectScale10 of 190Not in the top three
IBM Cloud Object Storage7 of 190Not in the top three
MinIO AIStor7 of 190Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Scality RING. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 19 answers that named Scality RING and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

solved.scality.comYour site17
gartner.com12
enterprisestorageforum.com11
solutionsreview.com11
worldmetrics.org11
cloudian.com10
cloudexpat.com6
mixpeek.com6
lowcloud.io4
systemwatchers.com4

Seventy-five of the ninety-two domain citations in answers naming Scality RING came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

solved.scality.com/best-object-storage-solutions-for-enterprises15
gartner.com/reviews/market/file-and-object-storage-platforms12
enterprisestorageforum.com/cloud/best-object-storage-solutions11
solutionsreview.com/data-storage/the-best-object-storage-solutions11
cloudexpat.com/blog/enterprise-cloud-storage-comparison-20256
worldmetrics.org/service/object-storage6
cloudexpat.com/blog/enterprise-cloud-storage-deep-dive-p25
lowcloud.io/en/blog/s3-compatible-object-storage4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Scality RING's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Scality RING, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at scality.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack