AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Google Cloud Storage · October 2026 Edition
Google Cloud · 2 categories · Ranked

Google Cloud Storage

138Judge labels
5First choices
43Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Object storage for enterprise buyers
Rank 7 of 51 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 21% of its 47 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Google Cloud Storage →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In object storage · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Cloud Storage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Object storageCloud and infrastructure2%7 of 5121%47accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Enterprise storage systemsCloud and infrastructure0%166 of 167100%2under 10 labels · led by Dell PowerStore at 16%

Movement

Since September 2026, Google Cloud Storage held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Object storage · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 of 34, unchanged
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 6 of 46
Enterprise▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 13 → 5 of 46

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Object storage0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 8 → 7 of 51
Enterprise storage0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 166 of 167, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Google Cloud Storage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500404
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash01135
Perplexity Sonar11002
Grok 4.2001135
Mistral Small01315
DeepSeek V4 Flash01304
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash01102
Kimi K203104
GLM 4.7 FlashX01124
MiniMax M2.502114
GPT-6 Luna02103
Muse Glimmer 30B01023

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct35 labels2
Paraphrase8 labelsNone
Comparative34 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained11 labels2
Scale-constrained19 labels1
Negative31 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative138 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best default choice is usually Google Cloud Storage” Perplexity Sonar · Object storage · direct prompt · first choice
“Known for high-performance internal networking and strong support for large-scale data analytics and machine learning pipelines” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Object storage · comparative prompt · alternative
“If the company is already using or planning to use Google Cloud services, Google Cloud Storage is a seamless choice.” Llama 4 Maverick · Object storage · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Data analytics / ML pipelines | Google Cloud Storage | Best integration with BigQuery, AI/ML tools” Kimi K2 · Object storage · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“"avoid or be cautious about ... those with high egress fees or minimum retention periods, such as GCS and Azure Cold"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Object storage · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid hyperscalers (AWS/GCP/Azure) on tight budgets due to egress/API add-ons.” Grok 4.20 · Object storage · budget prompt · hard negative
“public cloud object storage (AWS S3, Azure Blob, Google Cloud Storage) as an infinite dumping ground” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Enterprise storage · negative prompt · soft negative
“Outages: Frequent minor incidents; e.g., Google Cloud had prolonged regional degradations” Grok 4.20 · Object storage · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Cloud Storage, over the 137 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Cloud Storage was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
MinIO AIStor46 of 1370Not among the top eight
IBM Cloud Object Storage19 of 1370Not among the top eight
IDrive e214 of 1370Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Cloud Storage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 119 of the 137 answers that named Google Cloud Storage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

digitalocean.com55
solved.scality.com50
cloudian.com40
g2.com40
geekflare.com39
github.com39
backblaze.com37
enterprisestorageforum.com32
mixpeek.com28
atlantic.net27

387 of the 387 domain citations in answers naming Google Cloud Storage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cloud.google.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Google Cloud Storage takes 2% of first choices and Backblaze B2 takes 46%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “object storage service”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “object storage services”
4
Searches for its name, Google
18,100 a month (“google cloud storage”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
680 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 7,405,347 a month
Searches its site ranks for
70,320 · 16,032 in the top three
Sites linking to it
201,334
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 7 of 51 in object storage
Segment leader
46%
Backblaze B2
First choices
5 across its categories
Named in
137 answers
Its own site cited
in 119 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on cloud.google.com
79
subdomains included
Content
67
counted in the table below
Documentation
6
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog37142026-09-28API management
Case study19undated
Conference or event4undated
Report or ebook2undated
Glossary or explainer2undated
Webinar or virtual event1undated
Template or tool1undated
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cloud.google.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Google Cloud Storage

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Cloud Storage; a claim can dispute any of them.
Google Cloud Storage (GCS) 7GCP 4Google Cloud 2GCP Cloud Storage 1GCS 1Google 1

Follow Google Cloud Storage

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Google Cloud is the company behind Google Cloud Storage.
ShowHide
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Cloud Storage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Cloud Storage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Cloud Storage by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Google Cloud Storage is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Google Cloud Storage, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cloud.google.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.