IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Google Cloud Storage · September 2026 Edition
Google Cloud · 2 categories · Ranked

Google Cloud Storage

118Judge labels
1First choices
37Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Object storage for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 46 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 24% of its 45 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In object storage · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Cloud Storage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Object storageCloud and infrastructure0%8 of 4624%45accepted challenger
Backup and disaster recoveryCloud and infrastructure0%86 of 1210%1under 10 labels · led by Veeam at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Cloud Storage yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Cloud Storage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502305
GPT-5.4 mini02215
Gemini 3.5 Flash00325
Perplexity Sonar01023
Grok 4.1 Fast02204
Mistral Small02114
DeepSeek V4 Flash02125
Llama 4 Maverick00112
Qwen 3.7 Flash01113
Kimi K201113
GLM 4.7 FlashX01203
MiniMax M2.502204

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct22 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative26 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained15 labelsNone
Scale-constrained24 labels1
Negative28 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative118 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Google Cloud Storage uses Google's global network infrastructure to provide consistently fast data access” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Object storage · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Google Cloud Storage if your primary workload involves heavy data analytics, machine learning” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Object storage · comparative prompt · alternative
“Big 3 (AWS S3, GCP GCS, Azure Blob) have higher costs/egress but 99.99%+ SLAs, fewer complaints” Grok 4.1 Fast · Object storage · negative prompt · alternative
“Choose Google Cloud Storage if you're already on GCP or want strong global infrastructure” GPT-5.4 mini · Object storage · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“not budget-friendly for most use cases ... ~$20/TB/month plus ~$120/TB egress” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Object storage · budget prompt · hard negative
“Choose AWS S3, Google, or Azure only if you're already committed to that cloud ecosystem ... otherwise you'll pay 2–3× for the same storage.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Object storage · direct prompt · soft negative
“Hyperscaler "Cold" Tiers (AWS S3 Glacier, Google Archive, Azure Archive) ... massive financial hazard if misunderstood” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Object storage · negative prompt · soft negative
“be cautious if egress cost is a major factor... highest egress fees of major providers” Perplexity Sonar · Object storage · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Cloud Storage, over the 115 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Cloud Storage was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Amazon S3112 of 11534Not in the top three
Azure Blob Storage107 of 1154Not in the top three
Wasabi75 of 1159Not in the top three
Backblaze B271 of 11522Not in the top three
Cloudflare R263 of 11515Not in the top three
MinIO46 of 1150Not in the top three
DigitalOcean Spaces37 of 1151Not in the top three
IBM Cloud Object Storage26 of 1151Not in the top three
Scality RING15 of 1152Not in the top three
Linode Object Storage15 of 1150Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Cloud Storage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 80 of the 115 answers that named Google Cloud Storage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

solved.scality.com37
mixpeek.com36
digitalocean.com27
gartner.com27
enterprisestorageforum.com26
cloudexpat.com23
github.com23
worldmetrics.org21
cloudian.com19
solutionsreview.com19

258 of the 258 domain citations in answers naming Google Cloud Storage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Google Cloud Storage

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Cloud Storage; a claim can dispute any of them.
Google Cloud Storage (GCS) 7GCP 3GCS 2GCP GCS 1Google Archive 1Google Cloud 1Google Cloud Storage Nearline / Coldline / Archive 1Google Cloud Storage Standard 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Cloud Storage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Cloud Storage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.dev is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack