IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Wrike · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Wrike

15Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Wrike was named 6 times in Orchestration, where Prefect led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business15 of 78

under the label threshold

Mid-market20 of 86

under the label threshold

Enterprise17 of 89

under the label threshold

In orchestration · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Wrike for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workflow orchestration	Data platform	0%	20 of 86	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Prefect at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wrike yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wrike across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Wrike is a better fit if the main need is coordinating cross-functional work” Perplexity Sonar · Orchestration · direct prompt · alternative

“Cross-functional project/business processes ... mid-market standard” Grok 4.1 Fast · Orchestration · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wrike, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wrike was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zapier13 of 154Not in the top three

Make10 of 154Not in the top three

n8n9 of 152Not in the top three

Prefect9 of 151Not in the top three

Apache Airflow7 of 150Not in the top three

Dagster4 of 151Not in the top three

Workato4 of 151Not in the top three

Camunda4 of 150Not in the top three

Teamwork.com4 of 150Not in the top three

Temporal4 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wrike. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Wrike and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wrike.comYour site15

teamwork.com13

zapier.com12

elementum.ai11

enate.io8

larksuite.com7

thedigitalprojectmanager.com7

devopsschool.com6

unmeshed.io6

cflowapps.com5

Seventy-five of the ninety domain citations in answers naming Wrike came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

wrike.com/workflow-guide/workflow-orchestration-tools15

teamwork.com/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools13

zapier.com/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools12

elementum.ai/blog/best-workflow-orchestration-tools11

enate.io/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools8

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-workflow-orchestration-tools-features-pros-cons-comparison6

unmeshed.io/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools-20266

larksuite.com/en_us/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Wrike

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Wrike; a claim can dispute any of them.

Teamwork/Wrike 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wrike's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wrike, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wrike.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.