AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Trustible · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Trustible

11Judge labels
3First choices
1Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in AI governance for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 135 in the mid-market standing
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business39 of 144
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market4 of 135
6%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise118 of 131
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In ai governance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Trustible for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI governance platformsData platform6%4 of 1350%6under 10 labels · led by Credo AI at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Trustible yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Trustible across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash20103
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna10001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels2
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative2 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Pick for Mid-Market: Trustible ... It is the most practical, audit-ready GRC platform for mid-market teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI governance · direct prompt · first choice
“Trustible is the first platform I'd demo for a typical mid-market B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · AI governance · direct prompt · first choice
“Trustible is the strongest fit” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI governance · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trustible, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trustible was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Credo AI10 of 110Not among the top eight
OneTrust AI Governance6 of 110Not among the top eight
IBM watsonx.governance5 of 110Not among the top eight
Microsoft Purview5 of 110Not among the top eight
Fiddler AI4 of 110Not among the top eight
Holistic AI4 of 110Not among the top eight
Galileo3 of 110Not among the top eight
ServiceNow AI Control Tower3 of 110Not among the top eight
Speakeasy3 of 110Not among the top eight
Strac3 of 110Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trustible. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Trustible and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

trustible.aiYour site7
arthur.ai5
gartner.com5
optro.ai5
superblocks.com5
anaconda.com4
domo.com4
galileo.ai4
speakeasy.com4
credo.ai3

Thirty-nine of the forty-six domain citations in answers naming Trustible came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

trustible.ai/types-of-ai-governance-platforms6
arthur.ai/column/best-ai-governance-platforms-20265
optro.ai/blog/best-ai-governance-software5
anaconda.com/guides/ai-governance-platform-trust4
domo.com/learn/article/ai-governance-tools4
speakeasy.com/blog/best-ai-governance-platforms-20264
decube.io/post/ai-governance-tools3
galileo.ai/blog/best-ai-governance-platforms-regulated-industries3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

trustible.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Trustible takes 6% of first choices and Credo AI takes 18%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ai governance platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ai governance platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
320 a month (“trustible”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 376 a month
Searches its site ranks for
142 · 1 in the top three
Sites linking to it
728
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
7 ads · 4 text, 2 image, 1 video · 5 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2026, as Trible AI, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 7 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
6%
rank 4 of 135 in AI governance
Segment leader
18%
Credo AI
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
11 answers
Its own site cited
in 11 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on trustible.ai
775
subdomains included
Content
12
counted in the table below
Documentation
89
Product · Integration
6 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer612026-08-13
Comparison302026-05-12
Conference or event112026-09-22
Report or ebook102025-03-26
News or press112026-08-18

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page trustible.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Trustible

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Trustible is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The AI governance platform for regulated enterprises
trustible.ai
For
regulated enterprises
trustible.ai
Certifications
SOC 2SOC 2 certified
Customers named
LeidosNuixAshoka
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Trustible's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: trustible.ai, trust.trustible.ai, trustible.ai/platform-overview. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trustible's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trustible, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trustible by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Trustible is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trustible, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at trustible.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.