Embedded analytics · October 2026 Edition
Luzmo vs ThoughtSpot Embedded
One of fourteen models named Luzmo first on the direct prompt; one named ThoughtSpot Embedded. Luzmo was named by eleven of the fourteen models and ThoughtSpot Embedded by eleven and Luzmo carries 29 labels and ThoughtSpot Embedded 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share13%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%19%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 19; printed, not drawn.
Labels2936A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Luzmo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Sisense was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Metabase vs Luzmo · Metabase vs ThoughtSpot Embedded · Sisense vs Luzmo
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the embedded analytics page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LuzmoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsThoughtSpot Embedded
Direct111 against ThoughtSpot Embedded
Paraphrase411 against ThoughtSpot Embedded
Comparative02
Budget-constrained101 against Luzmo · 2 against ThoughtSpot Embedded
Scale-constrained11
Negative103 against ThoughtSpot Embedded
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Luzmo and ThoughtSpot Embedded were named in the same answer thirty-three times, of the 84 answers naming Luzmo and the 94 naming ThoughtSpot Embedded. In those answers ThoughtSpot Embedded took the first choice three times and Luzmo six.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Luzmo and ThoughtSpot Embedded stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Luzmo ThoughtSpot Embedded first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Luzmo on the left and ThoughtSpot Embedded on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Luzmo and ThoughtSpot Embedded stood in it.
Luzmo first, ThoughtSpot Embedded not the choice
1 of 14 modelsThoughtSpot Embedded was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.DeepSeek V4 FlashLuzmo alternatives: GoodData, Sisense
ThoughtSpot Embedded first, Luzmo not the choice
1 of 14 modelsLuzmo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Perplexity SonarThoughtSpot Embedded alternatives: Cube, Looker, Zoho Analytics
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniSisense alternatives: Looker, Power BI Embedded, ThoughtSpot Embedded
Gemini 3.5 FlashOmni alternatives: Embeddable, Luzmo, Metabase, Qrvey
Qwen 3.7 FlashSisense alternatives: Looker, Microsoft Power BI Embedded, ThoughtSpot Embedded
GLM 4.7 FlashXMetabase alternatives: Looker, ThoughtSpot Embedded
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Power BI Embedded alternatives: Cube, Explo, Grow, Looker, Metabase, Sisense, Tableau Embedded Analytics, ThoughtSpot Embedded
GPT-6 LunaMetabase alternatives: Looker Embed, Sisense, ThoughtSpot Embedded
Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Sisense alternatives: Holistics, Looker Embedded, Metabase, Power BI Embedded
Grok 4.1 FastReveal BI alternatives: Bold BI, Domo Everywhere, Power BI Embedded, Tableau, Zoho Analytics
Mistral SmallExplo, Sisense alternatives: Microsoft Power BI Embedded, Tableau Embedded Analytics
Llama 4 MaverickReveal BI alternatives: Cube.dev, Omni.co, Thinklytics Insights, Zoho
Kimi K2Explo alternatives: Looker, Metabase, Power BI Embedded, Preset
Muse Glimmer 30BSisense alternatives: Reveal BI, Toucan
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Luzmo leads by twelve points.
Luzmo12%#2 of 17ThoughtSpot Embedded0%#12 of 17Mid-marketThe figures above
Luzmo leads by seven points.
Luzmo13%#3 of 19ThoughtSpot Embedded5%#5 of 19Enterprise
The order flips: ThoughtSpot Embedded leads at enterprise.
ThoughtSpot Embedded2%#10 of 15Luzmo0%#13 of 15What the models said about Luzmo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“avoid per-viewer pricing like Metabase Pro or Luzmo if user base grows fast” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Luzmo or Explo if your top priority is fast, white-labeled dashboard embedding with minimal engineering overhead.” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Dedicated embedded analytics platforms (like Luzmo, Toucan, Reveal, Cube) were built from the ground up for embedding.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“If you want to get it done in a week with a beautiful, fully white-labeled UX and zero developer headache: Go with Luzmo.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about ThoughtSpot Embedded
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid: Looker, Domo, ThoughtSpot, and GoodData if budget is your primary constraint” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“ThoughtSpot — embedded but still iframe/API oriented, with limitations around flexibility and governance overhead” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“were primarily built for internal analyst teams, not customer-facing embedding” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“I would choose ThoughtSpot Embedded for a typical mid-market B2B company that wants a mature platform and quicker adoption.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
“ThoughtSpot is positioned as an AI-native analytics platform... ThoughtSpot wins on pure AI and ease of use” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best overall balance for product-led customer facing analytics: Sigma Embedded or ThoughtSpot Embedded” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Metabase vs LuzmoMetabase vs ThoughtSpot EmbeddedSisense vs LuzmoSisense vs ThoughtSpot EmbeddedLuzmo vs ExploLuzmo vs CubeLuzmo vs GoodDataLuzmo vs Apache SupersetExplo vs ThoughtSpot EmbeddedThoughtSpot Embedded vs CubeThoughtSpot Embedded vs GoodDataThoughtSpot Embedded vs Apache SupersetAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full embedded analytics standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.