Acreto
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT and IoT security | Security operations | 4% | 8 of 107 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for IoT at 21% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Acreto across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“another platform designed to be simple and affordable for small and mid-sized organizations” Mistral Small · OT/IoT security · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall budget pick: Acreto” Perplexity Sonar · OT/IoT security · budget prompt · first choice
“Acreto provides good value for small and mid-sized companies, as it replaces multiple point products with a single platform” MiniMax M2.5 · OT/IoT security · budget prompt · alternative
“Marketred specifically as a low-complexity, cost-conscious alternative for SMEs.” Muse Glimmer 30B · OT/IoT security · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“pricing is not published and it may be more of a full-network replacement than a standalone OT monitoring tool” DeepSeek V4 Flash · OT/IoT security · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Acreto, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acreto was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Acreto and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
104 of the 104 domain citations in answers naming Acreto came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
acreto.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Acreto takes 4% of first choices and Microsoft Defender for IoT takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“acreto”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1 · 0 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 221
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 17 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 17 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Acreto
Follow Acreto
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Acreto's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Acreto, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Acreto by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Acreto is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Acreto, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.