Every category where a model named Syndigo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Master data management	Data platform	0%	12 of 92	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Syndigo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Syndigo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	3	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Product-Centric B2B (Retail/CPG): Syndigo” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Master data · direct prompt · alternative

“Syndigo / Pimcore: best where PIM and MDM overlap.” GPT-5.4 mini · Master data · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Syndigo, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Syndigo was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Informatica MDM14 of 174Not among the top eight

Semarchy xDM12 of 170Not among the top eight

Stibo Systems STEP11 of 170Not among the top eight

Profisee MDM10 of 173Not among the top eight

Reltio10 of 171Not among the top eight

SAP Master Data Governance10 of 170Not among the top eight

Ataccama ONE9 of 170Not among the top eight

Boomi Data Hub5 of 170Not among the top eight

IBM InfoSphere5 of 170Not among the top eight

CluedIn4 of 170Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Syndigo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Syndigo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atrocore.com9

profisee.com9

explodingtopics.com7

gartner.com6

informatica.com6

ciopages.com5

decidesoftware.com5

ovaledge.com5

semarchy.com5

winpure.com5

No domain is on file for Syndigo, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

atrocore.com/en/blog/best-master-data-management-tools7

explodingtopics.com/blog/mdm-tools7

profisee.com/30-best-master-data-management-tools7

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/master-data-management5

decidesoftware.com/top-master-data-management-software5

ovaledge.com/blog/master-data-management-tools5

winpure.com/master-data-management-tools5

fortegrp.com/insights/top-19-data-management-tools-platforms-in-the-usa4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Syndigo stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 4,400 a month (“syndigo”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 163 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 12 of 92 in master data

Segment leader

41%

Profisee MDM

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 17 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Syndigo

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Syndigo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Syndigo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Syndigo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Syndigo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Syndigo, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.