IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Strike Graph · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Strike Graph

11Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Strike Graph was named 4 times in Compliance automation, where Drata led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business6 of 60

under the label threshold

Mid-market20 of 54

under the label threshold

Enterprise50 of 54

under the label threshold

In compliance automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Strike Graph for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compliance automation	Security operations	0%	20 of 54	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Drata at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Strike Graph yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Strike Graph across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For SMBs or those needing expert guidance, Scytale or Strike Graph may be best.” Mistral Small · Compliance automation · comparative prompt · alternative

“Published pricing (unlike most competitors), user-friendly interface” MiniMax M2.5 · Compliance automation · budget prompt · alternative

“Developer-friendly, risk-based; G2 4.7/5.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Compliance automation · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Strike Graph, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Strike Graph was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Drata11 of 110Not in the top three

Vanta9 of 111Not in the top three

Sprinto8 of 113Not in the top three

Hyperproof5 of 110Not in the top three

Secureframe5 of 110Not in the top three

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management4 of 110Not in the top three

MetricStream3 of 110Not in the top three

OneTrust3 of 110Not in the top three

Scrut Automation3 of 110Not in the top three

LowerPlane2 of 111Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Strike Graph. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 11 answers that named Strike Graph and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

orbiqhq.com6

auditxyz.com5

soc2auditors.org5

vanta.com5

cynomi.com4

g2.com4

incorp.com4

iotbusinessnews.com4

sprinto.com4

apptega.com3

Forty-four of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming Strike Graph came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

auditxyz.com/compare/best-compliance-automation-platforms5

soc2auditors.org/insights/best-compliance-software-small-business5

cynomi.com/learn/compliance-automation-tools4

incorp.com/resources/knowledge-base/best-compliance-tools4

iotbusinessnews.com/2024/05/14/65046-8-best-automated-compliance-platforms4

apptega.com/blog/compliance-automation-software3

consilien.com/news/best-compliance-automation-platforms-20263

optro.ai/blog/compliance-automation-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Strike Graph's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Strike Graph, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at strikegraph.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.