Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 7 of 59
1 category · RankedSpike.sh
11Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Incidents for small business buyers
Rank 29 of 65 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 63
2%10 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market29 of 65
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In incidents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Spike.sh for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incident management and on-call | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 29 of 65 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by incident.io at 32% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Spike.sh held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Incidents · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 28 of 57
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incidents | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 29 of 65 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Spike.sh across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Spike.sh across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase5 labels1
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Spike.sh is a lightweight budget option that combines on-call, escalations, incidents, and status pages in one product at $7/user/month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Incidents · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Spike.sh, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spike.sh was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Spike.sh, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spike.sh was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spike.sh. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Spike.sh and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
incident.io7
guideflow.com6
instatus.com6
betterstack.com4
complyjet.com4
firsthr.app4
hyperping.com4
motadata.com4
rootly.com4
sherlocks.ai4
Forty-seven of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming Spike.sh came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
spike.sh is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Spike.sh takes 0% of first choices and incident.io takes 32%.ShowHide
Search and answers
spike.sh is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Spike.sh takes 0% of first choices and incident.io takes 32%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “incident management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “incident management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 20 a month (“spike.sh”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,691 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 999 · 7 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 397
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 29 of 65 in incidents
Segment leader
32%
incident.io
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on spike.sh
513
subdomains included
Content
231
counted in the table below
Documentation
205
Product · Integration
0 · 41
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 167 | 5 | 2026-09-04 | Incidents | |
| Comparison | 37 | 0 | 2026-02-06 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 13 | 2 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Case study | 10 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 4 | 2026-09-08 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-08What is an incident glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-08Introduction to playbooks report or ebook
- 2026-09-08Actions in playbooks report or ebook
- 2026-09-08Automating your playbooks report or ebook
- 2026-09-08Run playbooks manually report or ebook
- 2026-09-04Introducing new spike blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page spike.sh exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Spike.sh
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Spike.sh is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Spike.sh is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Incident management and on-call for teams.
- For
- teams
- Price stated
- Per user / month spike.sh
- Starting price
- 7 spike.sh
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day free trial. No credit card required. spike.sh
- Integrations claimed
- 80 spike.sh
- Certifications
- GDPR compliantISOFedRAMPPCI Service Provider Level 1
- Customers named
- AccentureNeatWolters KluwerChaloWebprosSocialBeeThndrSportskeeda
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Spike.sh's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: spike.sh, spike.sh/pricing, spike.sh/security, spike.sh/customers, spike.sh/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spike.sh's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spike.sh, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Spike.sh by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Spike.sh is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Spike.sh, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.