| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data quality and observability | Data platform | 9% | 2 of 110 | 7% | 42 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Soda is often the better default because mid-sized teams usually benefit from faster adoption and built-in observability” GPT-5.4 mini · Data observability · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd shortlist Soda. It offers checks and monitoring across common warehouses and databases” GPT-6 Luna · Data observability · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“best value choice is usually Great Expectations (GX Core) or Soda Free/open-source first” GPT-5.4 mini · Data observability · budget prompt · first choice
“the best default pick is usually Soda or Monte Carlo” GPT-5.4 mini · Data observability · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Why be cautious: if you plan to stay on Soda Core open-source, assess ongoing support and feature parity; Soda Cloud pricing and roadmap are not self-serve” Muse Glimmer 30B · Data observability · negative prompt · soft negative
“License change risk... Not full observability... Limited out-of-the-box metrics.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Data observability · negative prompt · soft negative
“Soda might require more upfront effort to configure tests” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Data observability · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 97 of the 106 answers that named Soda and are not a share of its labels.
306 of the 306 domain citations in answers naming Soda came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 94 | 8 | 2026-08-19 | Observability | |
| Template or tool | 21 | 21 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 20 | 2 | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Comparison | 13 | 2 | 2026-07-21 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-06-08 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Every page soda.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Soda's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: soda.io, soda.io/pricing, trust.soda.io, soda.io/product/mcp, soda.io/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Soda's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Soda, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Soda by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Soda is among the products AI models recommend first in Data quality and observability this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.